My personal hypothesis - T2 - Low insulin Diet

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
My thinking is that once your body gets enough food in one hit , it goes into overdrive to process it all . That is possibly why eating more ( of the right stuff at the right time ) may actuially help weight loss. I have been a little surprised to find that eating a ridiculously rich meal once per day has actually resulted in slightly less calories overall than i was doing in the previous couple of months. Basically every single time I opened the fridge door , i woke my system up , increased the insulin , woke up ghrelin etc . And even if each time was 50 calories or less it added up to more food and less satiety . Now that happens once per day ,I eat till I've got the 100 percent nutrients , I'm full and I'm done . Brilliant .
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
A trip to the farmers market, plus pheasant, mixed game, and proper chicken - yum I'm looking forward to next week :) (I don't intend to eat is all myself :) but all of the "tops" have now gone in a stewpot to make a veggie broth .
 

Attachments

  • WP_20171015_15_20_12_Pro__highrescompressed farmrs mkt .jpg
    WP_20171015_15_20_12_Pro__highrescompressed farmrs mkt .jpg
    54.8 KB · Views: 203

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
On your quest to reduce insulin - how does that equate to this thread?
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/forum/thr...carb-diet-find-they-need-more-insulin.127884/
I realise that these are type 1 folk - but the context is the same - isn't it?

Low carb requires more Insulin....
I have to say - every day I read stuff on this site and I think - I really haven't got this yet :)


I am not sure you can equate what happens in T1 with what happens in T2 , they are so fundamentally different I am not sure why they even have a similar name! As far as I understand it - in T1 there is no insulin in the body to speak of and so a person suffering from it must take insulin . There will be a complex interplay of how to take that insulin in the context of the person's actual diet depending on the proportion of carbs,proteins and fats and I do not pretend to understand what that might be.
The posters that followed that thread tried to explain this and also explained that high fat also contributes to insulin resistance itself - this is another reason I am trying to see if I can get my metabolism working a bit better with slightly more carbs and slightly less fat overall. Many individuals withT1 find that they need less insulin when following an LCHF and there will be many examples of that here and elsewhere and perhaps one of those people might be able to comment on their own experience of that. There are other individuals with T1 on here who do not find LCHF conducive to their personal health and no doubt they have theories on that too.

Generally speaking ( and no doubt those with T1 will correct me if necessary ) I understand that T1 is not characterised by obesity, instead most will be quite slim, at least initially, though they may subsequently then put on weight because the insulin that they have to take is indeed the "fat making hormone" Thus its very possible to end up with the symptoms of both T1 (no insulin) and T2 (metabolic syndrome) after being diagnosed T1 and then injecting insulin.
Look up Dr Jason Fung on the subject of double diabetes if you would like to understand more about this.

For T2 diabetes the dynamics tend to be different. At the point of diagnosis, many people will be at the fattest that have ever been, it is likely that each of their insulin levels, blood glucose, triglycerides will all be sky high and their HDL will be very low.
I do not know if ALL of those people will have high insulin, I am not a doctor, though I suspect that generally speaking those generalities will be true . Such people will find it very hard to lose weight and it is only when they start reducing the insulin load on their body, which eating LCHF does do, that they start to lose weight, reduce fasting insulin, blood glucose levels and triglyicerides and their HDL starts to recover. As the posters on that thread point out one of the side effects of the LCHF diet is that it does tend to make your body even more insulin resistant , so actually getting the right proportions of carbs to minimise this is difficult . In practice with a true LCHF diet, that additional insulin resistance is not too big a problem, simply because there is little insulin requirement at all. That is why though, that if one wants to do an OGTT test - then in order for that to be a true test of your " insulin resistance" it is necessary to carb load first ( as I did in the test I posted on here).


For some people T2 diagnosis will come at a different stage in development and it will be diagnosed when the individual concerned may start to lose weight rapidly for no apparent reason. Again I am not a doctor, I can only try to interpret what I have read in a layman type format. My understanding is that these individuals will no longer have very high insulin levels, instead they will have become very low, similar to T1 and a curve of their insulin using an OGTT would look more like the kraft curve no 5, with little insulin and very high blood sugars, whereas the previous ones show high insulin and high blood sugars.

As far as I understand it - having high levels of insulin in the body is a precursor to many diseases and as such the lower it is the better. At the same time, having too little is even more of a problem. The optimum level is one which is low, but highly insulin sensitive so that your body responds to the insulin it gets either of its own creation or via injection .

The way to make your body insulin sensitive is to have low levels of circulating insulin and little pancreatic fat , whilst also not eating things that cause it to spike ( processed foods and omega 6 oils) - and doing things that help improve insulin sensitivity of which - eating adequate fibres ( 20g per day ) and getting exercise - to the high intensity variety - are considered to be the best ways to do that. theoretically if one can improve all of the above, then it should become more possible eat more carbohydrates because your body will need less insulin to process them. Until that happens limiting eating them in the first place is a sensible choice.

That's the best I can do in trying to explain what I think is happening. if you would like to follow it up further please get hold of for example Dr Robert Lustig - Fat Chance - I think you might find it enlightening.
 

Fleegle

Well-Known Member
Messages
775
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
I am not sure you can equate what happens in T1 with what happens in T2 , they are so fundamentally different I am not sure why they even have a similar name! As far as I understand it - in T1 there is no insulin in the body to speak of and so a person suffering from it must take insulin . There will be a complex interplay of how to take that insulin in the context of the person's actual diet depending on the proportion of carbs,proteins and fats and I do not pretend to understand what that might be.
The posters that followed that thread tried to explain this and also explained that high fat also contributes to insulin resistance itself - this is another reason I am trying to see if I can get my metabolism working a bit better with slightly more carbs and slightly less fat overall. Many individuals withT1 find that they need less insulin when following an LCHF and there will be many examples of that here and elsewhere and perhaps one of those people might be able to comment on their own experience of that. There are other individuals with T1 on here who do not find LCHF conducive to their personal health and no doubt they have theories on that too.

Generally speaking ( and no doubt those with T1 will correct me if necessary ) I understand that T1 is not characterised by obesity, instead most will be quite slim, at least initially, though they may subsequently then put on weight because the insulin that they have to take is indeed the "fat making hormone" Thus its very possible to end up with the symptoms of both T1 (no insulin) and T2 (metabolic syndrome) after being diagnosed T1 and then injecting insulin.
Look up Dr Jason Fung on the subject of double diabetes if you would like to understand more about this.

For T2 diabetes the dynamics tend to be different. At the point of diagnosis, many people will be at the fattest that have ever been, it is likely that each of their insulin levels, blood glucose, triglycerides will all be sky high and their HDL will be very low.
I do not know if ALL of those people will have high insulin, I am not a doctor, though I suspect that generally speaking those generalities will be true . Such people will find it very hard to lose weight and it is only when they start reducing the insulin load on their body, which eating LCHF does do, that they start to lose weight, reduce fasting insulin, blood glucose levels and triglyicerides and their HDL starts to recover. As the posters on that thread point out one of the side effects of the LCHF diet is that it does tend to make your body even more insulin resistant , so actually getting the right proportions of carbs to minimise this is difficult . In practice with a true LCHF diet, that additional insulin resistance is not too big a problem, simply because there is little insulin requirement at all. That is why though, that if one wants to do an OGTT test - then in order for that to be a true test of your " insulin resistance" it is necessary to carb load first ( as I did in the test I posted on here).


For some people T2 diagnosis will come at a different stage in development and it will be diagnosed when the individual concerned may start to lose weight rapidly for no apparent reason. Again I am not a doctor, I can only try to interpret what I have read in a layman type format. My understanding is that these individuals will no longer have very high insulin levels, instead they will have become very low, similar to T1 and a curve of their insulin using an OGTT would look more like the kraft curve no 5, with little insulin and very high blood sugars, whereas the previous ones show high insulin and high blood sugars.

As far as I understand it - having high levels of insulin in the body is a precursor to many diseases and as such the lower it is the better. At the same time, having too little is even more of a problem. The optimum level is one which is low, but highly insulin sensitive so that your body responds to the insulin it gets either of its own creation or via injection .

The way to make your body insulin sensitive is to have low levels of circulating insulin and little pancreatic fat , whilst also not eating things that cause it to spike ( processed foods and omega 6 oils) - and doing things that help improve insulin sensitivity of which - eating adequate fibres ( 20g per day ) and getting exercise - to the high intensity variety - are considered to be the best ways to do that. theoretically if one can improve all of the above, then it should become more possible eat more carbohydrates because your body will need less insulin to process them. Until that happens limiting eating them in the first place is a sensible choice.

That's the best I can do in trying to explain what I think is happening. if you would like to follow it up further please get hold of for example Dr Robert Lustig - Fat Chance - I think you might find it enlightening.

Thanks @CherryAA. Yes T1's are so different - but so similar to. Particularly around high levels of insulin causing the same issues and BG spikes being caused by different foods. The fundamental difference as far as I can see is that there is a need to replace insulin which is not being produced.

However - it is interesting isn't it that a group that can measure exactly how much insulin they are adding (as opposed to us who are guessing?) report this. I thought you would find that interesting. I wonder if that is what causes BG to raise after a time of low carb and needing to go lower and lower (there are quite a few threads on here - I researched them heavily when I noted my BG rising through fewer and fewer carbs). Also - it might hold some explanation to the need to up carbs before a OGT. Perhaps it isn't just physiological after all? Who knows.

I am following this thread and all threads on insulin with real interest.

It is a real pain not being able to measure your insulin. I know you can have a test done - but it gets quite expensive if you do it after every food to see which ones spike your own insulin. I am sure an insulin meter will be produced at some point - someone will figure out how to measure like the Cpep in a handy home meter soon I am sure.

Because it seems to me that given your theories, and the supporting evidence from the other online specialists (Dr Fung as an example) that measuring Insulin would seem to be even more important than measuring BG for a type 2 at least.
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Thanks @CherryAA. Yes T1's are so different - but so similar to. Particularly around high levels of insulin causing the same issues and BG spikes being caused by different foods. The fundamental difference as far as I can see is that there is a need to replace insulin which is not being produced.

However - it is interesting isn't it that a group that can measure exactly how much insulin they are adding (as opposed to us who are guessing?) report this. I thought you would find that interesting. I wonder if that is what causes BG to raise after a time of low carb and needing to go lower and lower (there are quite a few threads on here - I researched them heavily when I noted my BG rising through fewer and fewer carbs). Also - it might hold some explanation to the need to up carbs before a OGT. Perhaps it isn't just physiological after all? Who knows.

I am following this thread and all threads on insulin with real interest.

It is a real pain not being able to measure your insulin. I know you can have a test done - but it gets quite expensive if you do it after every food to see which ones spike your own insulin. I am sure an insulin meter will be produced at some point - someone will figure out how to measure like the Cpep in a handy home meter soon I am sure.

Because it seems to me that given your theories, and the supporting evidence from the other online specialists (Dr Fung as an example) that measuring Insulin would seem to be even more important than measuring BG for a type 2 at least.


I completely agree that this should be a standard NHS test. Its ludicrous for any person diagnosed with T2 to b given insulin injections without having some idea of how high their level already is !
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Day 16 done 1160 calories 31 net carbs, 20 fibre 65 protein, 80 fat fo which sat 4 mono 30 Om 3 2.6 ome 6 4.2 ( note to self go buy cod liver oil. Dinner was plate of mixed bits, salmon pate, mackerel hummus, parma ham spinach toms , cheese tomato onion mush omelette, some glorious farmers market cream berries and almonds Calories a bit low because of running out of cod liver oil and forgetting to use olive oil. fats 62% overall.

Today I reminded myself why fibre - the non soluble stuff is supposed to bind to something or other which then prevents the glucose getting into the blood stream quickly which prevents the spike and thus stops the need for insulin. ( so sayeth today's hero Dr Lustig) he goes so far as to suggest that it may actually be the fact that processing foods destroys the fibre that is the prime reason processed foods are so bad for you.

Today I decided to try this out so I had my vinegar and oil, then I ate a 400g head of celery with salt 64 cal, 6.5 fibre 3 .5 net cabs .That one thing provides 16% of all daily nutrient needs including all vit K. most vit A and a lot of potassium. I then left a gap of 15 minutes before my main meal.which included a further 27g net carbs, 17g fibre and 65g protein.

Somewhat extraordinarily my meal has not registered at all on the glucose meter staying around 5.5 =/- .2 ever since. .
Might be a coincidence- Will do it again going forward with other main meals and see if the two things seem to be linked. A good way to get extra salt too!





T
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Day 17 of the Low Insulin Diet (starting weight 91.6 kg, current 85.3 kg )
Waist size 86.0 cm (starting 94 cm)

After a very good day of only 1150 calories but after a lot of walking, I have put 0.9 kg on !
BP 116/76 after D2 no drugs (so starting point 106/76 D1, ) no drugs BP drugs usually equals water retention and rising weight followed by rising blood pressure - so clearly still not out of the woods on that. I've taken the meds again today, so the water retention should go back down, .
Yesterday average glucose 5.5, overnight average today 5.0 . There never was a spike from the main meal yesterday, so definitely repeating the same trick today - bring on the celery! .
Today I also see some magic lasagne and prawn soup in my stars.
Have a happy day all.
 

Kentoldlady1

Well-Known Member
Messages
733
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Day 16 done 1160 calories 31 net carbs, 20 fibre 65 protein, 80 fat fo which sat 4 mono 30 Om 3 2.6 ome 6 4.2 ( note to self go buy cod liver oil. Dinner was plate of mixed bits, salmon pate, mackerel hummus, parma ham spinach toms , cheese tomato onion mush omelette, some glorious farmers market cream berries and almonds Calories a bit low because of running out of cod liver oil and forgetting to use olive oil. fats 62% overall.

Today I reminded myself why fibre - the non soluble stuff is supposed to bind to something or other which then prevents the glucose getting into the blood stream quickly which prevents the spike and thus stops the need for insulin. ( so sayeth today's hero Dr Lustig) he goes so far as to suggest that it may actually be the fact that processing foods destroys the fibre that is the prime reason processed foods are so bad for you.

Today I decided to try this out so I had my vinegar and oil, then I ate a 400g head of celery with salt 64 cal, 6.5 fibre 3 .5 net cabs .That one thing provides 16% of all daily nutrient needs including all vit K. most vit A and a lot of potassium. I then left a gap of 15 minutes before my main meal.which included a further 27g net carbs, 17g fibre and 65g protein.

Somewhat extraordinarily my meal has not registered at all on the glucose meter staying around 5.5 =/- .2 ever since. .
Might be a coincidence- Will do it again going forward with other main meals and see if the two things seem to be linked. A good way to get extra salt too!





T
Hello cherry, fascinating as usual!

Very interesting about the fibre. I have had a bit of a bumpy week. Grandchildren poorly, so quite a bit of late night babysitting. And then we had a weekend away.

Anyway ( too much info coming up) I managed to get very constipated and I had some fibrgel.
On Saturday we went national trusting and I decided to try my very scientific scone experiment. And had one scone with butter and tea with milk. I did this about 3 weeks ago and it did not go well. From 5.2 I was 9.2 at 60 mins , 10.2 at 1.5hrs, down to 7 at 2 hrs.
This Saturday I did it again, with much the same results.

On sunday, yet another national trust and I thought sod it and had another scone. But this time I had fibregel just before and started at 5.0. My 1hr was 6.1 , at 1.5 it was 7.0 back down to 5.2 at 2 hrs.
Both scones had about 30 grms carbs, plus butter and milk in tea.
The only difference was the fibre.

I know this proves nothing but I think I am going to try it again a few times.

Keep posting!!!
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Hello cherry, fascinating as usual!

Very interesting about the fibre. I have had a bit of a bumpy week. Grandchildren poorly, so quite a bit of late night babysitting. And then we had a weekend away.

Anyway ( too much info coming up) I managed to get very constipated and I had some fibrgel.
On Saturday we went national trusting and I decided to try my very scientific scone experiment. And had one scone with butter and tea with milk. I did this about 3 weeks ago and it did not go well. From 5.2 I was 9.2 at 60 mins , 10.2 at 1.5hrs, down to 7 at 2 hrs.
This Saturday I did it again, with much the same results.

On sunday, yet another national trust and I thought sod it and had another scone. But this time I had fibregel just before and started at 5.0. My 1hr was 6.1 , at 1.5 it was 7.0 back down to 5.2 at 2 hrs.
Both scones had about 30 grms carbs, plus butter and milk in tea.
The only difference was the fibre.

I know this proves nothing but I think I am going to try it again a few times.

Keep posting!!!

That's a very interesting corroboration, so thank you. Its strange really, I read all the stuff, I derive conclusions what to do, but then there is so much stuff swirling round in one's head that remembering just why I chose to do those things is quite hard. That's why every few days I try to go through a bit of the logic again, just so I remind myself why .

Having read up the blurb of fibregel complete with its list of warnings , maybe give your scone a try with a head of celery about 20 minutes before and see what that does instead? .

Thinking about this all further, the other thing I did about a month ago was to buy some different types of Konjac and Nori. (Japaneses seeweed) I have a whole cupboard full of it ready to eat, then I kinda forgot why I bought it.

The reason I bought it is because they are both simply 100% fibre.

There are a variety available on Amazon.
Slimpasta.co.uk do slim pasta penne, 4g fibre 9 calories pretty much nothing else for 100g.
Miracle noodles - ( just put them into the hot sauce and swish it about a bit to get noodles ( if you boil it it disappears )

or for an occasional treat try Clearspring Seaveg Chillie Cripsies a toasted nori snack - though it has been toasted mainly in rapeseed ( 2:1 Om 6 to om3 yeah ) with some sunflower ( (65 : 0 Om 6 to 3 boo)

I have tried all of these out recently and they all taste nice . What I didn't do at the time is specifically correlate that to that day's blood sugars

I've just gone back and checked my lowest day's average glucose readings and sure enough it matches to when I ate the konjac noodles !

Note to self :
Celery is a great pre- meal snack choice because its kinda like having an apple in terms of the eating experience and it tastes even better with salt which is quite hard to get enough of otherwise if the diet is all fresh food.

Adding a portion of konjac noodles to most meals happily adds pure fibre and pretty much nothing else, Having a couple of Seaveg chill thins will probably help!
Adding all of them to my diet will deliver practically no additional calories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvia

Kristin251

Expert
Messages
5,334
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
This could be exactly why my beloved avocado keeps me so steady!!! It keeps things low and slow.

Every time I eat a meal without avo, or without enough even, I either drop then rise or just rise fast. I think all that creamy fatty goodness helps too.

I'm not sure why butnit is the only fiber I can properly digest.

Now I have even more of a reason to keep chowing it down!!
 

Kristin251

Expert
Messages
5,334
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
Hello cherry, fascinating as usual!

Very interesting about the fibre. I have had a bit of a bumpy week. Grandchildren poorly, so quite a bit of late night babysitting. And then we had a weekend away.

Anyway ( too much info coming up) I managed to get very constipated and I had some fibrgel.
On Saturday we went national trusting and I decided to try my very scientific scone experiment. And had one scone with butter and tea with milk. I did this about 3 weeks ago and it did not go well. From 5.2 I was 9.2 at 60 mins , 10.2 at 1.5hrs, down to 7 at 2 hrs.
This Saturday I did it again, with much the same results.

On sunday, yet another national trust and I thought sod it and had another scone. But this time I had fibregel just before and started at 5.0. My 1hr was 6.1 , at 1.5 it was 7.0 back down to 5.2 at 2 hrs.
Both scones had about 30 grms carbs, plus butter and milk in tea.
The only difference was the fibre.

I know this proves nothing but I think I am going to try it again a few times.

Keep posting!!!
I'm just sorry to hear you'll have to keep eating those scones to finish this ever so scientific experiment. Must be difficult!!! Haha

Maybe try some avo on it to make it even better!!
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Day 18 of the Low Insulin Diet (starting weight 91.6 kg, current 84.6 kg )
Waist size 86.0 cm (starting 94 cm)

It seems my new go to set weight is 85kg ! still that's better than the 89kg I had for months - every half stone counts.
yesterday I had the prawn bouillabaise but with added konjac noodles and the magic lasagne.

The results 0.7 kg down over yesterday - which has happened every time I ate the lasagne so far !
Overnight average bg 4.4 mmol - overnight under 5 has also happened each time I eat the konjac noodles.

bp 127/76 (though back on the meds). yesterday in my enthusiasm for trying out the fibre, I ate a couple of nori sheets around 11.00 (total 5 calories about ) - I was surprised to find that that re-awakened the hunger pangs so it was a much bigger struggle to get to my main meal time.

ketones have stayed at or above 1.2 throughout.

One thing I am itching to find out, is if the fibre can actually help stop the morning liver dump which is quite pronounced today. I deliberately didn't try it today so I could see the effect of yesterday on my liver dump.
Today I am going to eat exactly the same as yesterday then tomorrow morning I will add a portion of the plain konjac noodles just reconstituted with my breakfast black coffee and see if that makes any difference to my own generation of glucose as shown by the liver dump- as opposed to the stuff that comes from eating it.
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
oops- so much for doing a repetition - I forgot I had dinner out tonight So today's food will be a little later than usual, I've already planned it - cod and chorizo in chimchirri butter to start, ribeye steak, bearnaise sauce, roast pumpkin and mushrooms and a glass of wine ! I will do the apple cider vinegar and cod liver oil , plus a tiny portion of konjac noodles before I set off :) see what that does to my weight tomorrow.

Meanwhile a bit of a landmark day today. For the very first time I stepped on the Tanita scales and my metabolic age equalled my actual age with a 9.5 score on the visceral fat gauge. 18 days ago I was apparently 74 years old with a score of 11.
So at present I appear to have gained a year per day :) I intend to spend all 15 of them eating good food !
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Well the plan went well :) deduct cod and chorizo "off the menu " and add chicken skewer with avocado and lime to start, rib-eye pretty much as planned plus some coleslaw, to finish a half a portion of a stunning flour free chocolate cake and vanilla ice -cream. The entire lot came to about 1600 calories.119 protein 35 carbs 60% fat.
I as 4.5 bs before I began, had the konjak noodles in a half cup of vegetable stock before setting off so started the meal at 5.00. Over the next two hours it gradually just carried on drifting downwards as if I wasn't actually eating at all right back to 4.3 - a brief 15 minute blip to 5.7 about 45 minutes after the cake, then straight back to 4.3 again.
I think I like konjac noodles ! though i guess I may be back over 85 again tomorrow !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goonergal

DCUKMod

Master
Staff Member
Messages
14,298
Type of diabetes
I reversed my Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Well the plan went well :) deduct cod and chorizo "off the menu " and add chicken skewer with avocado and lime to start, rib-eye pretty much as planned plus some coleslaw, to finish a half a portion of a stunning flour free chocolate cake and vanilla ice -cream. The entire lot came to about 1600 calories.119 protein 35 carbs 60% fat.
I as 4.5 bs before I began, had the konjak noodles in a half cup of vegetable stock before setting off so started the meal at 5.00. Over the next two hours it gradually just carried on drifting downwards as if I wasn't actually eating at all right back to 4.3 - a brief 15 minute blip to 5.7 about 45 minutes after the cake, then straight back to 4.3 again.
I think I like konjac noodles ! though i guess I may be back over 85 again tomorrow !

35gr carbs for coleslaw, chocolate cake and icecream seems maybe a bit light?
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
35gr carbs for coleslaw, chocolate cake and icecream seems maybe a bit light?
It might be a little , though I had half portions of all of those and the cake was flour and sugar free. very hard to guestimate I made up a recipe for such a cake from the net and then guessed my bit !

I'm kinda thinking it must be ballpark ish otherwise my BS would probably have gone higher than 5.7 !
 

DCUKMod

Master
Staff Member
Messages
14,298
Type of diabetes
I reversed my Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
It might be a little , though I had half portions of all of those and the cake was flour and sugar free. very hard to guestimate I made up a recipe for such a cake from the net and then guessed my bit !

I'm kinda thinking it must be ballpark ish otherwise my BS would probably have gone higher than 5.7 !

You didn't mention sugar-free initially, although I'd be sceptical about that bit, as most having agave or the likes of maple syrup to allow justifying the s-f label.

I'm suggesting you're being disingenuous, more that I tend to be a little sceptical of some restaurant labelling versus our own standards.
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
You didn't mention sugar-free initially, although I'd be sceptical about that bit, as most having agave or the likes of maple syrup to allow justifying the s-f label.

I'm suggesting you're being disingenuous, more that I tend to be a little sceptical of some restaurant labelling versus our own standards.

I agree entirely - but then my healthy chocolate cake desert plus ice cream changed by blood sugars by only 0.6 mmol for about 15 minutes- so whatever they put in it - does seem like it was good stuff! (not to be repeated very often in any event ! )
 

CherryAA

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,171
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Day 19 of the Low Insulin Diet (starting weight 91.6 kg, current 85.3 kg 6.7% down)
Waist size 86.0 cm (starting 94 cm)


So my meal out last night gave me back the 0.7 kg I lost the day before .( it as worth it though) Yesterday's meal I estimated at 1600 calories though hard to tell what others put in the foods.
bp 135/70 . The meal did not cause a rise beyond 5.7 and overnight average bg was 4.4 mmol -
I tried a bit of vegbroth and konjac first thing this morning and my morning liver dump has topped out at 6.4 mmol ( yesterday 8.1) so I am going to continue with that for a while. It was actually lovely to go out for a meal yesterdy knowing that because it was the only food in the day I could eat a fully sociable meal - clearly I still had to make the right choices, but it is nice to simply feel " normal".