I was diagnosed as T2 Diabetic in 1996. Back then I looked at the various Diabetes support boards and was dismayed at the way people seemed to allow diabetes to define them. So I stopped visiting those sites. In February I will be moving onto Insulin and I have reviseited Diabetes.co.uk to seek some understanding of what I face.
Instead of finding support I find my fears of losing my driving licence, and my livelihood and my home aggravated. I find conflicting information on diet. I have started doing research and I am increasingly inclined towards the opinions that:
a/ NHS Diabetes care is an off the shelf solution, when itactually needs to be tailored to each individual. I now understand that when diagnosed initially insulin may have helped delay the deterioration of the pancreatic operation and that it has shown in some cases to effect restoration for a period. This was never discussed. Instead it was Metformin and beat the hell out of the pancreas for as long as we can.
b/ Doctors and Nurses give set advice - I was told that I couldn't drink alcohol - quite contrary to all the guidance I find now. I was told that exercise will help cut blood sugar levels - it doesn't on its own, it raises them. I was told to exclude sugar and eat carbs in moderation, (who's moderation?). The questions asked were standardised. I walked out on one review because the nurse hadn't even read the basic notes. (Mind you, I've had doctors who have done the same and made incorrect presumptions).
c/ Some people proffer guidance without thinking that their solution may not be the same as the next. I was told to eat salads - raw tomato shoots my blood sugar sky high, cooked not so much ( it should in theory be the other way around) - that is just a small example.
How do people differentiate the care/ the advice/ the diet that is right for themselves? Is it all trial and error? :?
Instead of finding support I find my fears of losing my driving licence, and my livelihood and my home aggravated. I find conflicting information on diet. I have started doing research and I am increasingly inclined towards the opinions that:
a/ NHS Diabetes care is an off the shelf solution, when itactually needs to be tailored to each individual. I now understand that when diagnosed initially insulin may have helped delay the deterioration of the pancreatic operation and that it has shown in some cases to effect restoration for a period. This was never discussed. Instead it was Metformin and beat the hell out of the pancreas for as long as we can.
b/ Doctors and Nurses give set advice - I was told that I couldn't drink alcohol - quite contrary to all the guidance I find now. I was told that exercise will help cut blood sugar levels - it doesn't on its own, it raises them. I was told to exclude sugar and eat carbs in moderation, (who's moderation?). The questions asked were standardised. I walked out on one review because the nurse hadn't even read the basic notes. (Mind you, I've had doctors who have done the same and made incorrect presumptions).
c/ Some people proffer guidance without thinking that their solution may not be the same as the next. I was told to eat salads - raw tomato shoots my blood sugar sky high, cooked not so much ( it should in theory be the other way around) - that is just a small example.
How do people differentiate the care/ the advice/ the diet that is right for themselves? Is it all trial and error? :?