- Messages
- 4,238
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
-
Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
I recently went to a Diabetes bash where there was a lot of discussion about how to reduce the incidence of Diabetes, and what you would do if you were the Government and able to legislate. You will note that the solutions are very T2-centric, since research is the main tool for reducing the incidence of T1 (IMHO).
The general consensus was that banning and taxing stuff is not always the most effective solution, and that education should be the chosen long term objective.
So there were two main groups of solutions:
There was strong support for LCHF but dieticians were still pushing the "healthy carbohydrates" and "you need carbohydrates to feed your brain" line as they have no doubt been taught.
There was quite a bit of "well, yes, butter is O.K. but you wouldn't want to eat a lot of it" from the group as well.
This forum illustrates that there is no single view of what is good and bad nutrition and we are (hopefully) more open thinking than most.
However in my biased opinion the priority is to establish a research body not funded by the food & drug industry which can look at food trials and drug trials (including currently unpublished studies which go against what industry wants) and especially consider the benefits of NOT taking drugs.
How can we campaign for healthy eating and healthy living if we can't even agree what it is?
Education of children is essential, but at least as important is the re-education of the adult population.
Which brave souls, however, are going to campaign against the massive economic power of the food & drugs industry who rely on ever increasing consumption to fuel their growth and prosperity?
The general consensus was that banning and taxing stuff is not always the most effective solution, and that education should be the chosen long term objective.
So there were two main groups of solutions:
- Legislate to discourage the production and sale of unhealthy foods, including sugar tax and restriction on the display of unhealthy foods in shops and supermarkets.
- Education, education, education about what is a healthy diet and what foods are unhealthy and should be avoided.
There was strong support for LCHF but dieticians were still pushing the "healthy carbohydrates" and "you need carbohydrates to feed your brain" line as they have no doubt been taught.
There was quite a bit of "well, yes, butter is O.K. but you wouldn't want to eat a lot of it" from the group as well.
This forum illustrates that there is no single view of what is good and bad nutrition and we are (hopefully) more open thinking than most.
However in my biased opinion the priority is to establish a research body not funded by the food & drug industry which can look at food trials and drug trials (including currently unpublished studies which go against what industry wants) and especially consider the benefits of NOT taking drugs.
How can we campaign for healthy eating and healthy living if we can't even agree what it is?
Education of children is essential, but at least as important is the re-education of the adult population.
Which brave souls, however, are going to campaign against the massive economic power of the food & drugs industry who rely on ever increasing consumption to fuel their growth and prosperity?