hi all
We are currently appealing a dla decision for my daughter, she had been recieving dla for 2 years them before her 13th birthday had to re-apply and was refused even though the circumstances had not changed. Applied for reconsideration which also was refused then took it to first tier appeal all evidence from doctors, diabetes nurses and blood glucose print outs confirming what we was saying. At the appeal I couldn't believe the idiots who were making decisions on people's lives. The GP didn't understand the difference between transition between ages 14-16 and transferring, and also a so called dwp representative not knowing how to turn a page to continue reading my daughter's daily diary. They even asked what dla rates I was on and what my hubby done for a living his my full time carer and recieved carers allowance this has nothing to do with my daughter claim. They refused again and made many mistakes and errors of law, so now in process of upper tier as a consultation with a solicitor confirmed they had not looked at all the evidence submitted
We are currently appealing a dla decision for my daughter, she had been recieving dla for 2 years them before her 13th birthday had to re-apply and was refused even though the circumstances had not changed. Applied for reconsideration which also was refused then took it to first tier appeal all evidence from doctors, diabetes nurses and blood glucose print outs confirming what we was saying. At the appeal I couldn't believe the idiots who were making decisions on people's lives. The GP didn't understand the difference between transition between ages 14-16 and transferring, and also a so called dwp representative not knowing how to turn a page to continue reading my daughter's daily diary. They even asked what dla rates I was on and what my hubby done for a living his my full time carer and recieved carers allowance this has nothing to do with my daughter claim. They refused again and made many mistakes and errors of law, so now in process of upper tier as a consultation with a solicitor confirmed they had not looked at all the evidence submitted