Another potential nail in LDL's coffin ?

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
Dave Feldman, author of the Cholesterol Code website, has just published a new article
http://cholesterolcode.com/remnant-cholesterol-what-every-low-carber-should-know/

I'd never even heard of remnant cholesterol, yet he concludes
"I’m hesitant to name any single lipid marker as the “best” one to measure. But if I had to choose right now, I’d be pointing to Remnant Cholesterol (RC). As of this writing, I haven’t found a single study that includes RCs in matchups with other lipids where it isn’t the clear winner in predicting all-cause mortality."

Remnant Cholesterol (RC) is simply TC - (HDL + LDL)

His article includes a link to a calculator. Over the last 7 years my RC has gone from 1.1 to 0.5 mmol/L, and from 21.5% to 9.6%. The relevance of these are shown here :
http://cholesterolcode.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/remnant_vs_ldl-1.jpg

I don't fully get what he's saying in the What This Means For Low Carbers section :
"the reference range for RCs as they apply to those on a fat-based diet may actually be inflated. In other words, I’d expect RCs to actually be higher for appropriate mechanistic reasons given the higher proportion of distribution by VLDLs when LCHF/Keto"

I'm only at the beginning of this RC learning curve, so this post is a heads-up to those interested.
Geoff
 

Guzzler

Master
Messages
10,577
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Poor grammar, bullying and drunks.
Could sdLDL be classed as RC? That which the liver refuses to have any truck with.
 

Oldvatr

Expert
Messages
8,470
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Dave Feldman, author of the Cholesterol Code website, has just published a new article
http://cholesterolcode.com/remnant-cholesterol-what-every-low-carber-should-know/

I'd never even heard of remnant cholesterol, yet he concludes
"I’m hesitant to name any single lipid marker as the “best” one to measure. But if I had to choose right now, I’d be pointing to Remnant Cholesterol (RC). As of this writing, I haven’t found a single study that includes RCs in matchups with other lipids where it isn’t the clear winner in predicting all-cause mortality."

Remnant Cholesterol (RC) is simply TC - (HDL + LDL)

His article includes a link to a calculator. Over the last 7 years my RC has gone from 1.1 to 0.5 mmol/L, and from 21.5% to 9.6%. The relevance of these are shown here :
http://cholesterolcode.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/remnant_vs_ldl-1.jpg

I don't fully get what he's saying in the What This Means For Low Carbers section :
"the reference range for RCs as they apply to those on a fat-based diet may actually be inflated. In other words, I’d expect RCs to actually be higher for appropriate mechanistic reasons given the higher proportion of distribution by VLDLs when LCHF/Keto"

I'm only at the beginning of this RC learning curve, so this post is a heads-up to those interested.
Geoff
Here in the UK, LDL is usually calulated using the Friedewald Formula
LDL = TC - HDL - TG

An actual lab essay of LDL is expensive, so it is only necessary to measure LDL in a sample where TG is high since the formula has good correlation to measured values for lower TG.

Ergo, RC in the OP post is what we in the UK call TG in the standard lipid panel.

Edit: recent understanding and research does seem to correlate TG with sLDL particles, and further correlates sLDL as being linked to CVE risk factor, This research is not yet accepted by mainstream endocrinology, but is the basic working hypothesis by the likes of Tim Noakes and Ken Sikaris et al.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ickihun and dbr10

Bluetit1802

Legend
Messages
25,216
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
This confuses me

It is very simply calculated: you just subtract HDL Cholesterol (HDLc) and LDL Cholesterol (LDLc) from your Total Cholesterol. (Second paragraph)

In UK measurements, subtracting the HDL and the LDL from the total leaves you with 46% of the triglycerides.
(Total cholesterol = HDL+LDL+46% trigs) So subtracting the HDL and LDL simply leaves 46% trigs.)

No idea why the remaining 54% trigs aren't included in the total.

Am I being brain dead - again?
 

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
This confuses me

It is very simply calculated: you just subtract HDL Cholesterol (HDLc) and LDL Cholesterol (LDLc) from your Total Cholesterol. (Second paragraph)

In UK measurements, subtracting the HDL and the LDL from the total leaves you with 46% of the triglycerides.
(Total cholesterol = HDL+LDL+46% trigs) So subtracting the HDL and LDL simply leaves 46% trigs.)

No idea why the remaining 54% trigs aren't included in the total.

Am I being brain dead - again?
Triglycerides are not a sub-division of cholesterol. Both are lipids. Trigs transport cholesterol.
 

Bluetit1802

Legend
Messages
25,216
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
Triglycerides are not a sub-division of cholesterol. Both are lipids. Trigs transport cholesterol.

But to me it seems like the remnant cholesterol is 46% of the trigs (UK measurements)
Am I wrong?

No I'm not wrong. I've just done the calculation he provides and the result is exactly 46% of my trigs. So why is he making it so complicated?
 
Last edited:

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
But to me it seems like the remnant cholesterol is 46% of the trigs (UK measurements)
Am I wrong?
In the Friedewald Formula, yes. Remember 46% was only an attempt at a best fit, so LDL is always to some degree estimated. Given LDL is in the RC equation, RC has to be somewhat estimated (in opposite direction to LDL mis-estimation).
Confusing, isn't it ?
 

Bluetit1802

Legend
Messages
25,216
Type of diabetes
Type 2 (in remission!)
Treatment type
Diet only
In the Friedewald Formula, yes. Remember 46% was only an attempt at a best fit, so LDL is always to some degree estimated. Given LDL is in the RC equation, RC has to be somewhat estimated (in opposite direction to LDL mis-estimation).
Confusing, isn't it ?

Sorry, I edited my last post before I saw your reply. I used his calculation tool and it comes out at exactly 46% of my trigs. So why is he making it so complicated?
 

LittleGreyCat

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,233
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Dislikes
Diet drinks - the artificial sweeteners taste vile.
Having to forswear foods I have loved all my life.
Trying to find low carb meals when eating out.
On another point, I was reading the description about how the VLDL etc. carried fats to the cells and then was remodelled by the liver. I got the impression that it was an out-and-back process where the fat went out to the body then the carriers got remodelled when they returned to the liver.

However I checked and it seems that an individual drop of blood completes a circuit of the body in around a minute.

So if it takes 90 minutes, for example, for a variant of LDL to complete the cycle of delivering fat to the tissues, it must pass through the liver around 90 times before being remodelled.

Trying to visualise this is doing my head in at the moment.
 

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
On another point, I was reading the description about how the VLDL etc. carried fats to the cells and then was remodelled by the liver. I got the impression that it was an out-and-back process where the fat went out to the body then the carriers got remodelled when they returned to the liver.

However I checked and it seems that an individual drop of blood completes a circuit of the body in around a minute.

So if it takes 90 minutes, for example, for a variant of LDL to complete the cycle of delivering fat to the tissues, it must pass through the liver around 90 times before being remodelled.

Trying to visualise this is doing my head in at the moment.
Think of particles as passengers on a train. They hop off at their station then get on again after their visit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ickihun

Oldvatr

Expert
Messages
8,470
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Tablets (oral)
Triglycerides are not a sub-division of cholesterol. Both are lipids. Trigs transport cholesterol.
My understanding is that trigs are packets of fatty acids, which get packaged in cholesterol bubbles that transport the insoluble lipids in the watery bloodstream without harm.

https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/how-its-made-cholesterol-production-in-your-body

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triglyceride

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholesterol

http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/ldl-hdl-differ-structurally-functionally-2003.html
 

Indy51

Expert
Messages
5,540
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dave Feldman's recent talk at Low Carb Down Under, Gold Coast:

 

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
You're quite right. Being a keen Arsenal fan, I made the mistake of starting a thread before a match I was watching closely.
My fingers were racing ahead of my brain.
Geoff
 

DaveKeto

Member
Messages
7
Hi guys! I got pinged to swing by and I see I could do a little expanding here. :)

So for the basics on lipoproteins, I highly recommend my Simple Guide series here: http://cholesterolcode.com/a-simple-guide-to-cholesterol-on-low-carb/ -- it's super layperson friendly and can help answer the lipoproteins purpose, triglycerides and cholesterol ridesharing together, and so forth.

The Friedewald equation is for LDL Cholesterol = Total Cholesterol - HDL Cholesterol - VLDL Cholesterol*
* Estimation of VLDL Cholesterol = Trigs/5 (Trigs/2.2 for mmol/L)

(To be sure, I think my tool converts mmol/L to mg/dL first, then does the imperial version for the Friedewald that's reported as an extra at the bottom.)
 

DaveKeto

Member
Messages
7
I don't fully get what he's saying in the What This Means For Low Carbers section :
"the reference range for RCs as they apply to those on a fat-based diet may actually be inflated. In other words, I’d expect RCs to actually be higher for appropriate mechanistic reasons given the higher proportion of distribution by VLDLs when LCHF/Keto"

Sorry, that is a poorly worded sentence. I should update it...

Basically, I'm saying reference ranges for low to high risk is probably different for those on a low carb diet over those on a high carb diet. A low carb diet has an appropriate reason to send out and traffick more VLDLs at any given time, given it is part of its core energy distribution. Whereas a high carb diet shouldn't be trafficking as many VLDLs given its primary energy is glucose/glycogen. Thus, it may well be a sign of trouble for the carb-centric diet at a certain RC level where it isn't for the low carber because it's routine.

Again, all of this comes back to the VLDLs themselves aren't the problem, it's the fact they are either (1) in a traffic jam (hyperinsulinemia/past fat threshold) or (2) higher quantities in order to fight disease (see Siobhan's upcoming piece). Either way, it can be a reflection of a broken system so long as one keeps the correct context in mind (how much VLDLs expected due to being fat-centric vs carb-centric).

I hope I articulated that a lot better.

tl:dr More VLDLs are appropriate on a fat-centric diet and may thus skew the RC ranges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: librarising

librarising

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Type of diabetes
LADA
Treatment type
Insulin
Sorry, that is a poorly worded sentence. I should update it...

I hope I articulated that a lot better.

tl:dr More VLDLs are appropriate on a fat-centric diet and may thus skew the RC ranges.
Thanks for the clarification @DaveKeto. That's a lot clearer. Loving your work.
Geoff
 
  • Like
Reactions: Biggles2

AtkinsMo

Well-Known Member
Messages
591
Type of diabetes
Prediabetes
Treatment type
Diet only
I was told, many years ago, that the Iranian equation is more accurate at estimating LDL than the Freidewald equation when trigs are low.
 

Guzzler

Master
Messages
10,577
Type of diabetes
Type 2
Treatment type
Diet only
Dislikes
Poor grammar, bullying and drunks.
Am I understanding all this correctly? Do not not fast before a blood draw to measure Cholesterol but do fast for a Triglyceride count? As all counts are normally taken from one blood draw how should we manage this?