I second that reply. I was certainly told that my baby would be fine when I had some (very) severe hypos during my first pregnancy. (Think unconscious with eyes rolling up in the back of your head and your husband thinks you're dying.) I've googled (you made me curious too) and though I've found some links to maternal diabetes and increased likelihood of autism, these appeared to be related to high blood sugars of the mothers and maternal obesity (so GDs and T2s did worse than T1s).
Honestly, you might as well blame yourself for wearing the wrong colour socks during pregnancy (maybe mothers who wear green are more likely to have children who refuse to eat spinach?
). Though I've always been a little paranoid about the chances of my kids developing T1, I've always promised myself not to enter the blame game if I do. I think the fear that a hypo may have caused developmental damage is similar, particularly when there really don't seem to be any studies suggesting it. And even if there were studies suggesting that hypos and autism were correlated, you still couldn't say that one hypo caused the issue, given that it could have just happened anyway. (Should scientists, mathematicians and engineers avoid having children because they may be more likely to be on the spectrum?)
ASD covers a multitude of personalities and behaviours, and can have benefits as well as disadvantages. Good luck with your son.