- Messages
- 3
Hi,
I'm 28 weeks into my second pregnancy currently. I thought something was a bit weird around three weeks ago and bought a blood glucose monitor, and took the monitoring results to my consultant who sent me for a OGTT on Tuesday.
I have no risk factors for GD except age (this is, apparently common), but - over the last three weeks - have developed GD so severely that I currently can't eat anything except the Atkin's Diet Induction Phase 1 (as in 10-15g of carbs per meal), which I'm sticking with (with my consultant's approval) until I see an endocrinologist on Monday. My OGTT result after 2 hours was 10.9.
There are lots of women who don't have risk factors, but I'm obviously perplexed about the situation. I am still exercising up to 3 hours a day at nearly 29 weeks pregnant - and not minor league exercise, such as walking. Instead, I'm cycling long distances, running with the dog, doing dance aerobics 4 times a week, and heavy cardio lifting exercises. I'm using the exercise to manage my blood glucose, which doesn't really go down on its own. My diet was low-GI before I became pregnant, and my BMI was around 22.
Husband and I are particularly perplexed by my glucose monitoring results. He has a sister with Type I and 48 hours ago started managing my blood sugar like Type I. So we're literally counting carbs and then matching them to my activity level. It appears that 10g of carbs cause my blood sugar to rise by 1 point and there seem to be no or limited homeostatic process controlling my blood sugar. Yesterday, I sat for three hours on the bed reading, measuring my blood sugar every hour (this was after cycling for two hours to take my son to and from nursery, and 45 minutes of dance aerobics - so I was legitimately tired, okay)... and it never moved from 5.5. This doesn't seem normal for ladies with GD who are advised to snack regularly to keep their blood sugar up (!?).
I have grandparents with Type II, which they developed in their 60s (they were classic Type II - high BMI and not much exercise). I also had an insulin resistance test that showed my fasting glucose was similar to my fasting insulin (so borderline and suggestive of Type II). In addition, I have an undiagnosed autoimmune disease that seems to be linked to my subfertility (this baby was IVF) and which was severe enough to take me off work for several years. Due to the symptoms, and damage to my hands (from poor circulation), we assume it's a connective tissue disease of some type, but I've never shown any real signs of organ or tissue damage, no suggestive antibodies of RA/lupus, and only have a low-titer ANA.
My husband and I are wondering if I actually have LADA exacerbated by pregnancy, due to the autoimmune problem, but I don't know if I'm kidding myself and it's possible that someone of 39 who exercises up to 3 hours per day at 29 weeks pregnant can get GD this badly and be at serious risk of Type II post-pregnancy? Anyone else with that experience?
Also, did anyone get diagnosed with LADA during pregnancy and does the 'static blood sugar' sound familiar? I posted on a support group for ladies with GD and they didn't understand what I was talking about. They said it was impossible to control blood sugar using techniques for Type I and that, due to hormones, there was a limited correlation between carbs in food and a lady's response to the sugar. They told me I had to get better at pairing carbs with fat/protein to release glucose more slowly and experiment with lots of different carbs until I could find one I could tolerate (which I was already doing - the glucose built up to the level in my blood you'd expect from the carb count of the meal, but slower with a slower GI carb than a fast one, and regardless of whether I ate green beans, tomatoes yoghurt, porridge, quinoa, Nairn's oatcakes, or rye bread).
Anyone have a similar experience?
I'm going to ask the endocrinologist for an antibody test on Monday, but feel a bit of a prat/a bit precious if there are lots of women with GD like me and it's just 'one of those things'...
I'm 28 weeks into my second pregnancy currently. I thought something was a bit weird around three weeks ago and bought a blood glucose monitor, and took the monitoring results to my consultant who sent me for a OGTT on Tuesday.
I have no risk factors for GD except age (this is, apparently common), but - over the last three weeks - have developed GD so severely that I currently can't eat anything except the Atkin's Diet Induction Phase 1 (as in 10-15g of carbs per meal), which I'm sticking with (with my consultant's approval) until I see an endocrinologist on Monday. My OGTT result after 2 hours was 10.9.
There are lots of women who don't have risk factors, but I'm obviously perplexed about the situation. I am still exercising up to 3 hours a day at nearly 29 weeks pregnant - and not minor league exercise, such as walking. Instead, I'm cycling long distances, running with the dog, doing dance aerobics 4 times a week, and heavy cardio lifting exercises. I'm using the exercise to manage my blood glucose, which doesn't really go down on its own. My diet was low-GI before I became pregnant, and my BMI was around 22.
Husband and I are particularly perplexed by my glucose monitoring results. He has a sister with Type I and 48 hours ago started managing my blood sugar like Type I. So we're literally counting carbs and then matching them to my activity level. It appears that 10g of carbs cause my blood sugar to rise by 1 point and there seem to be no or limited homeostatic process controlling my blood sugar. Yesterday, I sat for three hours on the bed reading, measuring my blood sugar every hour (this was after cycling for two hours to take my son to and from nursery, and 45 minutes of dance aerobics - so I was legitimately tired, okay)... and it never moved from 5.5. This doesn't seem normal for ladies with GD who are advised to snack regularly to keep their blood sugar up (!?).
I have grandparents with Type II, which they developed in their 60s (they were classic Type II - high BMI and not much exercise). I also had an insulin resistance test that showed my fasting glucose was similar to my fasting insulin (so borderline and suggestive of Type II). In addition, I have an undiagnosed autoimmune disease that seems to be linked to my subfertility (this baby was IVF) and which was severe enough to take me off work for several years. Due to the symptoms, and damage to my hands (from poor circulation), we assume it's a connective tissue disease of some type, but I've never shown any real signs of organ or tissue damage, no suggestive antibodies of RA/lupus, and only have a low-titer ANA.
My husband and I are wondering if I actually have LADA exacerbated by pregnancy, due to the autoimmune problem, but I don't know if I'm kidding myself and it's possible that someone of 39 who exercises up to 3 hours per day at 29 weeks pregnant can get GD this badly and be at serious risk of Type II post-pregnancy? Anyone else with that experience?
Also, did anyone get diagnosed with LADA during pregnancy and does the 'static blood sugar' sound familiar? I posted on a support group for ladies with GD and they didn't understand what I was talking about. They said it was impossible to control blood sugar using techniques for Type I and that, due to hormones, there was a limited correlation between carbs in food and a lady's response to the sugar. They told me I had to get better at pairing carbs with fat/protein to release glucose more slowly and experiment with lots of different carbs until I could find one I could tolerate (which I was already doing - the glucose built up to the level in my blood you'd expect from the carb count of the meal, but slower with a slower GI carb than a fast one, and regardless of whether I ate green beans, tomatoes yoghurt, porridge, quinoa, Nairn's oatcakes, or rye bread).
Anyone have a similar experience?
I'm going to ask the endocrinologist for an antibody test on Monday, but feel a bit of a prat/a bit precious if there are lots of women with GD like me and it's just 'one of those things'...