That is factual and reasoned. Those facts are very well known. If you Google in the right places you will see for yourself. The same goes for the solution as it is the reverse of the cause.
We need to take a step back to ensure that the facts are the facts.
To be up front I believe climate change is real. I object to interest groups using the animal agriculture to attempt to destroy this medicine for a huge population, for ideological/ religious reasons; whilst having the knock on effect of shilling for fake food.
To my original point I am uncomfortable with expert opinion to contrary views being heard, this is akin to Eric Westman or Sarah Halberg or Stephen Phinney not being on major public health boards of international influence. I want to know if climate change formulas have changed (I think I read they exclude the influence of the sun). I want those who are on decision making panels to have full conflict checks.
Why should "we" blindly trust experts, we did this we low fat, cholesterol / statins, epidemiology studies / relative risk and deisel emissions etc.
If we leave the facts unchallenged we'll get sh...ted again....now some are making noises about the uselessness of hybrid cars. And as for electric cars I am dubious of the lifecycle elements.