Yorksman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,445
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
Thommothebear said:Interesting - any guidelines on what is meant by "severe" calorie restriction? I'm calorie counting and aiming for around 1250 net calories at the moment, I am coping fairly well at that level and not feeling hungry but I'm not sure I would feel so comfortable at a lower level.
Taylor's term is 'energy restriction' at a level which is meant to mimmick the effects of having a gastric band fitted. Taylor's subjects were limited to 600 kcal in Optifast drinks plus 200 kcal in nonstarchy vegetables. But it was only an 8 week diet, not a permanent thing. Since that study, the Counterpoint Study, often refered to here as the Newcastle Diet, the team have published a follow up paper based on feedback from the public.
Population response to information on reversibility of Type 2 diabetes
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/di ... ctions.pdf
The original research is on a page entitled Reversing Type 2 Diabetes, http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/di ... versal.htm
That includes a pdf file, Low Calorie Diet Programme (800 calories per day) http://www.ncl.ac.uk/magres/research/di ... ecipes.pdf
I know what you mean though. I'm losing weight at the rate of 1 Kg every 9 days now but I eat well, carefully chosen foods, but enough to make me feel that I have eaten a meal. My BGs have come down to something more like normal levels. I wonder if I can summon up the courage to go lower and shock my system into clearing any blockages. Taylor hypothesises that the important factor are the liver and triglyceride levels as it is there that they lay down the fats which block the islets. I don't know how good these triglyceride levels are represented in the triglyceride level of a venous blood sample, but I suspect that you want that to be as low as you can get it.