gliclazide, type 2 and the police

[peterlemer]

My diabetes nurse has just told me that it's a potential offence if I'm stopped while driving without a meter reading >4 taken within the past 2 hours.
First I've heard of it. Can anyone point me to the relevant legislation?

cheers

pete

 

[graj0]

Hi Pete,

I think it's down to the fact that Gliclazide encourages the pancreas to produce more insulin therefore you are more prone to having a hypo, not inevitable, but more prone. Page five of https://www.diabetes.org.uk/upload/How we help/catalogue/DrivingandDiabetes_Final_ToUpload.pdf covers it. Good ole nurse, she might have saved you from some grief, especially if you had a hypo. I used to take gliclazide and I did have a hypo at home, not good.

 

[peterlemer]

Thanks Graj0, it all makes sense - except that I've never had a hypo in the last 13 years as T2D, so am not geared up for it. Will take this on board

pete

 

[graj0]

Hopefully you'll never have a problem, but at least you'll be prepared for the one officer who needs some browny points in a particular month. No offense intended to any officers of the law.

 

[peterlemer]

essentially, does this mean that I have to carry my prickmeter whenever I'm driving?

pete

 

[lessci]

Legally I believe you only have to test if you're on insulin. Before driving and every 2 hours during a journey, but double check I don't want to give you duff advise and get you into trouble

 

[Daibell]

Hi. Yes, legally you only have to check if you are on insulin and views vary whether it's 4 or 5 mmol to drive ('five to drive'). I try to be over 5 to allow for changes during driving. I agree on insulin you need to test within 30 minutes of starting to drive and every 2 hours after that. Gliclazide can cause hypos so it's a good idea to test if you know it works well. It was waste of time for me as my pancreas was too far gone so I never needed to worry even on max dose.

 

[peterlemer]

where can I get chapter and verse on the legal requirements for T2D on gliclazide to carry a BG meter? The pdf (above) isn't specific. It's one thing to take sensible precautions, its another to be in breach of the law.

 

[catherinecherub]

This article should help.

• Remember that diagnosis of diabetes treated with insulin or tablets that may cause hypoglycaemia means that you must inform both the DVLA and your motor insurers. This is a material change in your circumstances and failure to inform the DVLA could result in prosecution and your insurance being invalid.

http://iddt.org/about/living-with-diabetes/driving/hypoglycaemia-and-driving

 

[graj0]

http://www.leicestershirediabetes.o...nts/Safe Driving and the DVLA final050812.pdf

It might be clearer, it implies that it's only Class 2 licenses require the DVLA being informed.

There again, this next one is from the DVLA.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/193489/INF188_2.pdf

This would imply that one hypo and you should inform the DVLA and the implication is that it doesn't matter if you don't feel a hypo, below 4 mmol/l is a hypo. (I hope I got the units right - old money anyway). In fact, not being aware of a hypo is to be taken very seriously.

There again, there's complying with the law and doing what's sensible.

It's not very clear until you look at the DVLA document, which hopefully is clear.

 

[peterlemer]

Hi Catherine, the DVLA website says clearly:
Diabetes treated by Sulphonylureas or Glinide tablets (or both)
Diabetes treated by any other tablets or non-insulin injections
You don’t need to tell DVLA.

https://www.gov.uk/diabetes-driving

 

[peterlemer]

...and my insurers, Aviva, say they don;t flag non-insulin dependent diabetics.
So there appears to be a conflict of agreement here - pete

 

[graj0]

Hi Catherine, the DVLA website says clearly:
Diabetes treated by Sulphonylureas or Glinide tablets (or both)
Diabetes treated by any other tablets or non-insulin injections
You don’t need to tell DVLA.

https://www.gov.uk/diabetes-driving

Unless you have had a hypo.

 

[peterlemer]

Unless you have had a hypo.

thanks graj0, yes, that's what you warned earlier. I've had one 3.6 so far in 12+ years, and didn't feel any different than normal - but AIUI strip testing has a wide margin of error.

pete

 

[))Denise((]

It is a good idea to be aware of your BS levels when you are on gliclazide but there is no requirement to have test results when driving. Some Type 2's even if they are on gliclazide don't even have a meter.

 

[graj0]

thanks graj0, yes, that's what you warned earlier. I've had one 3.6 so far in 12+ years, and didn't feel any different than normal - but AIUI strip testing has a wide margin of error.

pete

The more I've read the more interesting it gets. They talk about "4 is the floor" although the biochemical classification of hypoglycemia varies between a blood glucose below 3.1 mmol/l to 3.9 mmol/l. Seems that your medical team can inform the DVLA if they think there is a risk. I can confirm that because my next door neighbour got a letter out of the blue from the DVLA withdrawing her license. Seems her GP had upped her dose of an antidepressant and then informed the DVLA without telling her first.

 

[Brunneria]

The more I've read the more interesting it gets. They talk about "4 is the floor" although the biochemical classification of hypoglycemia varies between a blood glucose below 3.1 mmol/l to 3.9 mmol/l. Seems that your medical team can inform the DVLA if they think there is a risk. I can confirm that because my next door neighbour got a letter out of the blue from the DVLA withdrawing her license. Seems her GP had upped her dose of an antidepressant and then informed the DVLA without telling her first.

Wow.
I'll bet that helped her depression.

 

[peterlemer]

scary stuff. We live in a rural area with no public transport. Losing my licence would be a major blow to my lifestyle

 

[desidiabulum]

scary stuff. We live in a rural area with no public transport. Losing my licence would be a major blow to my lifestyle

All the more reason to play safe. Just get used to checking your BGs automatically -- seat belt on, BG check - and you won't think about it. Yes it may be unnecessary and not a legal requirement, but you can feel assured that you are covered belt and braces. And you also know that you are showing extra concern for other road-users. So you can even feel smug as well.

 

[peterlemer]

good thinking, desidiabulum