Just downloaded it and a brief scan reveals quite a lot of sense but again it demonizes saturated fats. No one particularly denies the dangers of trans fats, junk food and other highly processed carbohydrates but stating as the book does "take the yolks out of eggs" and that people should avoid eating them or not drink whole milk or "cut all the excess fat off meat" has no real scientific basis in the 21st century.
If you have an open mind research this lady.
http://blogg.passagen.se/dahlqvistannika/?anchor=my_lowcarb_dietary_programe_in The link I've provided is for her low carb high fat regime recommended for weight loss and T2 diabetics. She was taken through the Swedish court system by dietitians back in 2006 for advocating a low carb high fat approach but won her case and nowadays the Swedish Healthcare system uses a lot of her recommendations for their dietary advice to both diabetics and their general population. Google "Kost Vid Diabetes" and get hold of the 2011 official Swedish Healthcare document for treating T2 diabetes to see her regime put into action at a national level. Sweden by the way has the worlds 3rd lowest rate of diabetes just behind Luxemborg and Iceland.
From 2011 onwards the Americans through the ADA's 2011 & 2012 position statements recommend carbohydrate intake be restricted to around 130g / day. On a 2000 calorie per day regime that amounts to a 26% carbohydrate regime. So what should people be eating for the other 74%? The RDA for protein is set at 16% so that leaves 58% as fat.
If you want links to all the info I've just mentioned just ask as they have been posted many times on this forum.
You may believe a low fat lifestyle is the only way but you are denying the results that I and others posted on the other thread you entered yesterday. How do you account for that fact that I meet all the N.I.C.E guideline targets on my 65% fat diet or that members like borofergie do an 80%+ fat diet and still meet the guidelines. Neither of us take statins. If your low fat theories were anywhere near the truth our cholesterol levels would be through the roof.
The issue is you are relying on old 20th century bad data and bad studies. Things have moved on and you and other health care professionals in this country need to retrain a learn about the counter studies and research done in this century in my opinion.