While we are off topic and writing about cancer instead of the sugar tax may I ask a question?
Would it be a shorter list and a whole lot quicker if we were all given a list of things that don't cause cancer?
Perhaps the Daily Fail could help here.
Post #32 of this thread has the link in it.I can't remember which show it was but I once saw a list of things the Daily Fail had said caused cancer in scary headlines - it was a very very long list!
"Shrinkflation" = when a chocolate bar or creme egg gets smaller but remains the same price.
People are already paying more for sweeties, but I am not sure if it puts them off
I therefore vote above for education.
Why do we need a 'Sugar Tax'?With the prospect of a sugar tax supported by Jamie Oliver (but refuted by David Cameron), what do people think - should there be a sugar tax? It has been reported that hypo treatments would be exempt from a sugar tax.
Labelling suggestions from Jamie:
If you think any choices are missing from the poll, please let us know and we'll update the poll
This is a prime example of why we do not need a sugar tax. We need education about carbohydrates and proteins and the affect on blood sugars. Pancakes roughly have 30gs of carbohydrates,6g of protein and 9gms of fats per 2 4inch america or 1 10inch crepe. No body eats plain pancakes most will add sugar them lets say another 15gs (per table spoon). Now we at 51gs of potential glucose (protein and carbs). We all know portion size isnt serving size. Who sticks at 2 pancakes and nothing else. Probably add orange juice 28g and coffee to breakfast Ill add 1g for the milk and who knows how many sugars people put in. I am already up to 80gs of sugar makers. Out of 180gs recomended on the eat well place and Ive only had a small breakfast leaving 50g each for lunch and dinner and no snacks. Portion sizes are a much more effective way of telling people they are eating too much glucose. Just pointing out sugars isnt going to work, there has to be a major shift in peoples eating habits, tax on sugar wont give them this advice.A tax on sugar would only put more money for the government to squander and the man in the street to lose. When I make pancakes the recipe calls for sugar and honey. I don't use either, just a wee bit sweetener and they are great.
So what price do you think you would have to add on top of the price of sugar to make people stop buying sugar? 20% 50% 200% 500% I still do not think people would stop buying sugar just on price. We already add 20% to sodas/fizzy drinks It doesnt work.But the sad truth is that the price of things does affect how much of them we buy. To be honest I'd rather have a whacking great tax on sugar with it ring-fenced for funding the NHS and the care of the elderly and vulnerable than some of the other taxation arrangements and suggestions made by our governments present and past.
So what price do you think you would have to add on top of the price of sugar to make people stop buying sugar? 20% 50% 200% 500% I still do not think people would stop buying sugar just on price. We already add 20% to sodas/fizzy drinks It doesnt work.
This is a good idea to sugar tax. The money collected can be use spesifically for helping diabetic related patients.