- Messages
- 3,291
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Tablets (oral)
- Dislikes
- Acceptance of health treatment claims that are not adequately supported by evidence. I dislike it when people sell ineffective and even harmful alternative health products to exploit the desperation of people with chronic illness.
A new member posted in a thread that "artificial sweeteners are evil one way or another so limit them" so I asked for more information about this, and suggested they start a new thread, to avoid derailing the one they were in. They responded that they didn't know how to start a new thread, so I thought I'd do the honours.
I'm not convinced that it is necessary to limit artificial sweeteners but I'm open to seeing any scientific studies showing that using them in recommended/usual amounts causes major harm. I admit that for some people, they have been found to cause problems, and those people seem to do better if they avoid using them. But at present I don't think this applies to the population as a whole.
The member said "My personal opinion on artificial sweeteners is based on massive doses of cyclamates and saccharine causing tumors, Splenda causing depression especially in women, Aspartame causing temporary blindness especially in summer, the fact that many pediatricians post these side effects in their offices to deter their use/"
My response to this is:
- If cyclamates and saccharine have been found to cause tumours, then it sounds like that was only in "massive doses". I'm not convinced that recommended/usual doses increase the risk of tumours, so would need to see scientific evidence to support this.
- I haven't read any scientific evidence that splenda causes depression, when used in the recommended/usual amounts.
- The same applies for aspartame causing temporary blindness.
- I would like to know roughly what proportion of paediatricians recommend people not use artificial sweeteners and on what basis.
Not trying to cause trouble, just would like to know if there is good reason for me to change my artificial sweetener use. I also think statements should be supportable by evidence, or if not, then it's better if they are clearly noted as opinions not facts.
I'm not convinced that it is necessary to limit artificial sweeteners but I'm open to seeing any scientific studies showing that using them in recommended/usual amounts causes major harm. I admit that for some people, they have been found to cause problems, and those people seem to do better if they avoid using them. But at present I don't think this applies to the population as a whole.
The member said "My personal opinion on artificial sweeteners is based on massive doses of cyclamates and saccharine causing tumors, Splenda causing depression especially in women, Aspartame causing temporary blindness especially in summer, the fact that many pediatricians post these side effects in their offices to deter their use/"
My response to this is:
- If cyclamates and saccharine have been found to cause tumours, then it sounds like that was only in "massive doses". I'm not convinced that recommended/usual doses increase the risk of tumours, so would need to see scientific evidence to support this.
- I haven't read any scientific evidence that splenda causes depression, when used in the recommended/usual amounts.
- The same applies for aspartame causing temporary blindness.
- I would like to know roughly what proportion of paediatricians recommend people not use artificial sweeteners and on what basis.
Not trying to cause trouble, just would like to know if there is good reason for me to change my artificial sweetener use. I also think statements should be supportable by evidence, or if not, then it's better if they are clearly noted as opinions not facts.