Anyone heard of this or tried it? Sounds interesting...
http://www.motleyhealth.com/diet-and-nu ... w-approach
http://www.motleyhealth.com/diet-and-nu ... w-approach
Whoops, sorry.daisy1 said:For those who are interested: do a search on "paleo" as there are many threads on this - 80 posts found. Well, 79 as the one from me is about a pop festival called Paleo :wink:
Thanks, will have a read.phoenix said:There's a comprehensive (but a bit dense) account on wiki.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolithic_diet
loads of recent videos about the 'paleo' way of living here at a recent conference. Many of the speakers are leading lights in the movement: (read the abstracts to get an idea as some are very specific but a few from people not normally considered paleo at all)
http://vimeo.com/ancestralhealthsymposi ... ort:newest
One source worth borowsing is called Paleohacks. it's a kind of forum and looking through you'll get some sort of feel for varied ways people approach paleo . It's not one diet. The movement has lots of controversies as to what constitutes paleo and there are lively ( :lol: ) debates about the types and proportions of foods that should form part of a diet .
Fencer said:Whoops, sorry.daisy1 said:For those who are interested: do a search on "paleo" as there are many threads on this - 80 posts found. Well, 79 as the one from me is about a pop festival called Paleo :wink:
http://thepaleodiet.com/wp-content/uplo ... cdiet1.pdfWe found that the macronutrient composition of the presumed
Paleolithic diet averaged 25–29 en% (range 8–35) from protein,
39–40 en% (19–48) from carbohydrate and 30–39 en%
(20–72) from fat. These data imply that Paleolithic diets provided
moderate-to-high protein and fat intakes, and moderate
carbohydrate intakes. The fatty acid composition was moderate-
to-high in MUFA and PUFA, but relatively high in SFA.
The PUFA were notably high in ALA, LCP n-3 and LCP
n-6, but low in LA, compared with the current Western intakes
and recommendations. With the previous limitations in mind,
the current data reflect the nutritional balance on, and selection
pressure under which, our genome evolved.
pianoman said:I also seem to recall mention of folks who only had access to rabbits (which are naturally very lean) and became sick and malnourished despite having apparent access to plenty of food.
It's obvious he doesn't like Cordain, in fact so much so that he starts from a totally wrong premise about fig 6, (read the coments where it has been pointed out and then tries to alter his arguments.reidpj said:Hi again
Here's another blog I follow (he's no fan of Cordain :wink: ) http://www.gnolls.org/715/when-the-conc ... ely-paleo/
Peter
lovinglife said:pianoman said:I also seem to recall mention of folks who only had access to rabbits (which are naturally very lean) and became sick and malnourished despite having apparent access to plenty of food.
Ah That was on QI - it was gold propectors I think - they didn't have access to ANYTHING other than rabbit and they actually died! :shock: - wasn't the leaness of the meat though - I think rabbit is lacking in something and even if they had had just cabbage and rabbit they would have survived - well so Stephen Fry said anyway :lol: - can't be bothered to google it though as I am tired and off to bed
Fencer said:Well... if there were plenty rabbits about, couldn't they have just stolen their cabbages?
Viv I would have though that any healthy mammal (including humans -- not that I am suggesting eating them!) would have some fat tissue all year around... maybe higher leading up to the Winter months but never absent? Also bone-marrow, brain etc... are all sources of fats.