- Messages
- 3,169
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
- Dislikes
- Racism, Sexism, Homophobia
borofergie said:This is what healthy eating looks like:
Looks more like a heart attack on a plate to me
lucylocket61 said:Sid Bonkers said:
Looks more like a heart attack on a plate to me
No, its all about portion control.
Ireneo Chipukunya said:Though pleasing on the eye,way too much saturated fat in there and in my view a definite recipe for more health troubles! I wouldn't to touch it under any circumstances, not even with a ten-foot pole!
Hi judith.WhitbyJet said:Try the baconcado, my sister-in-law brought this in for my lunch a few days ago, am being spoilt rotten
http://baconjew.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/baconcado.html
Ireneo Chipukunya said:Though pleasing on the eye,way too much saturated fat in there and in my view a definite recipe for more health troubles! I wouldn't to touch it under any circumstances, not even with a ten-foot pole!
Defren said:Ireneo Chipukunya said:Though pleasing on the eye,way too much saturated fat in there and in my view a definite recipe for more health troubles! I wouldn't to touch it under any circumstances, not even with a ten-foot pole!
The old views that sat fat is bad for us, is being eroded on an almost daily basis. I eat around 65% of my calories a day in sat fat and my cholesterol is normal. I eat around 30% as protein to fill me up and 5% as carbs. I have not felt as well as I do now for around 20 years, maybe more. If sat fat is going to kill me, then I will die happy and feeling wonderful, I doubt very much that is going to be the case though.
Ireneo Chipukunya said:Though pleasing on the eye,way too much saturated fat in there and in my view a definite recipe for more health troubles! I wouldn't to touch it under any circumstances, not even with a ten-foot pole!
A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.
We looked carefully at the saturated fat effects. With more saturated fat in the diet, we did see a signal for an increase in the overall amount of cholesterol in their blood. But when we looked more carefully, that slightly increased amount of total cholesterol was not being carried by more of the dangerous, small particle LDLs. It seemed to be carried more by larger particles. Actually, in the people eating more fat, and fewer carbs, the total particle concentration, which most people in our field think is a stronger signal of risk that total cholesterol, the total number of particles did not go up.
When people ate more fat and less carbohydrate, the number of small particle LDLs remained low, and switching from monounsaturated to saturated fat didn’t increase their number at all. In fact, when people switched from mono- to saturated fat in this study, the large particle LDLs might have gone up a little bit, and the small particles went down. So by anybody’s current criteria about whats’s important for heart disease risk, saturated fat caused no increase in risk. That was clear to people who understand the role to the lipoprotein particles, as opposed to the overall cholesterol level, which I’m sure for some people is a subtle distinction.