noblehead said:You have to remember Dawn that the main DCUK site is separate to that of the forum, some members eat carbs with every meal on here and others don't.......there's no right or wrong in how people manage their diabetes.
They [DCUK] have a big profile and organization – shouldn’t they be playing a more active role on committees of enquiry etc, as an alternative voice to DUK? The DCUK homepage explains that ‘our primary goal is to reduce suffering in the diabetes community’ and stresses the desire to offer ‘an alternative ... experience’, and ‘alternative content and resources’.
xyzzy said:noblehead said:You have to remember Dawn that the main DCUK site is separate to that of the forum, some members eat carbs with every meal on here and others don't.......there's no right or wrong in how people manage their diabetes.
Quite correct but as desidiabulum said the other day
They [DCUK] have a big profile and organization – shouldn’t they be playing a more active role on committees of enquiry etc, as an alternative voice to DUK? The DCUK homepage explains that ‘our primary goal is to reduce suffering in the diabetes community’ and stresses the desire to offer ‘an alternative ... experience’, and ‘alternative content and resources’.
What is the point if when push comes to shove they simply kowtow to the DUK line?
Stating a starchy carb with every meal message may well be fine and dandy for some diabetics but if that is the only message that is officially pushed by DCUK I fail to see how that meets their professed aims of 'reduce suffering in the diabetes' or to deliver ‘an alternative ... experience’ If you don't deliver those alternatives then they are just paying lip service to their aims. As far as I'm aware DCUK is not as legally obliged to push the official UK / NHS line like DUK is and is therefore not as constrained in publishing an alternative viewpoints that would have their official backing. It would be interesting to hear how DCUK reconcile their laudable aims with what they do in practice.
Robinredbreast said:Maybe a sensible thing to do is to word it as " Type 1 has no pancreass function as it has ceased to function, therefore with carb counting and Insulin dosage required to right amount of carbs ( obviously not newly diagnosed diabetics) "Type 2 have some function of the pancreass and they may need to reduce the amount of their carb intake with meals" something on those lines possibly, it could be great help to allA shake up is definately needed. Best wishes RRB
Yet whenever we inform the DUKs & dietitians of the benefits of rejecting their advice & going low carb, they are very quick to say "everybody is different, so do what works for you, but we will not change our general advice."xyzzy said:Yes I agree. If you put aside the fully legitimate debate as to why low carb may well be beneficial to Type 1's as well (for different but just as important reasons to T2's) then what it seems to reduce to is the inability, reluctance, corruptness, stubbornness, childishness (call it what you want) of stating the simple fact that a different dietary regime maybe preferable for T2's than the one advocated to the population as a whole.
This is the madness that is never addressed i.e. the ridiculous belief that a one size fits all diet is generally applicable to the entire population and that if you are T2 that you should still follow that one size only diet because the problems it could cause you are perfectly solvable by taking a load of strong medication and when that fails and kills your pancreas you can join the ranks of the T1's and inject insulin. Total madness :crazy:
IanD said:Yet whenever we inform the DUKs & dietitians of the benefits of rejecting their advice & going low carb, they are very quick to say "everybody is different, so do what works for you, but we will not change our general advice."xyzzy said:Yes I agree. If you put aside the fully legitimate debate as to why low carb may well be beneficial to Type 1's as well (for different but just as important reasons to T2's) then what it seems to reduce to is the inability, reluctance, corruptness, stubbornness, childishness (call it what you want) of stating the simple fact that a different dietary regime maybe preferable for T2's than the one advocated to the population as a whole.
This is the madness that is never addressed i.e. the ridiculous belief that a one size fits all diet is generally applicable to the entire population and that if you are T2 that you should still follow that one size only diet because the problems it could cause you are perfectly solvable by taking a load of strong medication and when that fails and kills your pancreas you can join the ranks of the T1's and inject insulin. Total madness :crazy:
There is an impasse.
phoenix said:Have you looked ?
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/diet-basics.html
Lot of info on the pros and cons of different diets
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/diet-for-type2-diabetes.html
an article describing some peoples disageement with NHS dietary advice plus info on low carbing.
As the site is a commercial site I'm not sure why you consider that they should be adopting any particular stance.
http://www.diabetes.co.uk/diet-for-type2-diabetes.html said:We’ve compiled some of the more prominent of these diets, looking at both the benefits and disadvantages of each diet.
Diet for Type 1 Diabetes
Diet for Type 2 Diabetes
Atkins Diet
DASH Diet
Dextox Diet
Dukan Diet
Gluten Free Diet
Glycaemic Index Diet (GI Diet)
Ketogenic Diet
Low Carb Diet
Low Carb High Fat Diet
Low Fat Diet
Mediterranean Diet
Newcastle Study Diet
NHS Diabetes Diet Advice
Paleolithic Diet
Raw Food Diet
South Beach Diet
Vegan Diet
Vegetarian Diet
Very Low Calorie Diet
Zone Diet
dawnmc said:Thats the one, bit of a joke too as how are we meant to test if we can't afford strips. My partner buys mine as I'm on negligable income, but if he didn't I'd be snookered. Esp, as I'm on diet only.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?