Terrible journalism in parts.
The use of meaningless statistics - 20% more, 50% more etc. without telling you the real figures.
Is it 1 in 1,000 gone up to 2 in 1,000? That is a 50% increase.
Also the death statistics - doesn't tell you how many non-diabetics die of vascular disease.
I thought that in old age either you got pneumonia or stroke/heart failure finished you off. Diabetic or not, everyone dies of something.
Also
People with diabetes have a foot amputated 70 times a week in England,
I pity the poor surgeon who has to keep sowing it back on - unless most diabetics are centipedes?
Also
So what is it? Diabetes is when there's too much glucose in the blood. Glucose is the body's fuel; our cells use it as their primary source of energy. But to enter a cell, glucose needs insulin, a hormone made by the pancreas. If for some reason we don't produce enough insulin, or the insulin we produce doesn't work properly, glucose builds up in the blood. That's diabetes.
The implication is that if you don't produce enough insulin then you can't get glucose into your cells. This would mean no energy. Personally I don't suffer from lack of energy even when my blood sugars are high. I may be wrong but I thought the problem with T2s was that the monitoring of BG and regulation by insulin was broken, so the bit of extra sugar in the blood wans't dumped out as fat once the basic cellular needs had been met.
In general an interesting article but still very mixed messages.
Cheers
LGC