Hi guys.
So I was at diabetes clinic yesterday. Doc wasn't impressed with my bloods or attitude. Anyway we had a rather heated discussion over hypos and lucozade. I work nights, doing physical work, lifting stuff, moving cages, unloading lorries that kinda stuff.
If my blood is say 8 around 11pm, bearing in mind my meal wont be till 0130-0200, I would have lucozade as I know from experience, I would be hypo before lunch time. Apparently Im not to have lucozade until blood is below 4.
My question is, is it not better to prevent the hypo, than waiting for the hypo before you do anything. Yes I understand that my blood does go quite high once ive had the lucozade, so I will agree I could drink less, but they wouldn't even have that. I know highs are bad, but it seems hypos don't matter until its actually low.
Thoughts?
So I was at diabetes clinic yesterday. Doc wasn't impressed with my bloods or attitude. Anyway we had a rather heated discussion over hypos and lucozade. I work nights, doing physical work, lifting stuff, moving cages, unloading lorries that kinda stuff.
If my blood is say 8 around 11pm, bearing in mind my meal wont be till 0130-0200, I would have lucozade as I know from experience, I would be hypo before lunch time. Apparently Im not to have lucozade until blood is below 4.
My question is, is it not better to prevent the hypo, than waiting for the hypo before you do anything. Yes I understand that my blood does go quite high once ive had the lucozade, so I will agree I could drink less, but they wouldn't even have that. I know highs are bad, but it seems hypos don't matter until its actually low.
Thoughts?