- Messages
- 140
- Type of diabetes
- Treatment type
- Diet only
.....what other (undesirable) effect might it have on your body?
This is from a blog I follow. The author has been managing his T2 diabetes without medication for 13 years... yes, that's right, 13 years!
He does so, simply by diet and exercise alone. He blogs on his progress, and seems, to me at least, to have a very balanced approach to management of his diabetes.
He has experimented over those 13 years with different diets and exercise, and tested his blood to see the effect. So he has a lot of experience, and as such, knows what works for him and what doesn't. Remember we are all different, but this subject may affect us all.
This is from his latest blog, on the subject of a newly published Swedish study. Admittedly, it's a small sample study, only 39 people.... but the results show that saturated fat is apparently more likely to promote accumulation of liver fat and visceral fat than unsaturated fat.
He says:
...... "I no longer believe that saturated fat raises blood cholesterol. I have had ample opportunity to experiment with different diets in the years since my diabetes diagnosis, and I still get the same low cholesterol readings on my lab results regardless of whether my diet is centered around bacon or brussels sprouts. For me, what matters is how much I exercise, not what kind of fats I'm including in my diet; once I started a regular exercise program my cholesterol numbers dropped sharply, and haven't climbed back despite all sorts of different approaches to diet.
However, the mere fact that saturated fat doesn't appear to be the cholesterol-raising villain that we were told it was does not mean saturated fat has no other effects which might be undesirable. I am still willing to be told that evidence has been found for other reasons to minimize saturated fat in the diet.
A new study from Sweden claims to have found such evidence"......
The result: "Despite comparable weight gains between the two diet groups, the surplus consumption of saturated fat caused a markedly greater increase in the amount of fat in the liver and abdomen (especially the fat surrounding the internal organs, visceral fat) in comparison with the surplus consumption of polyunsaturated fat. Moreover the total amount of body fat was greater in the saturated fat group, while, on the other hand, the increase in muscle mass was three times less for those who ate saturated fat compared with those who ate polyunsaturated fat. Thus, gaining weight on excess calories from polyunsaturated fat caused more gain in muscle mass, and less body fat than overeating a similar amount of saturated fat."
"So there you have it. Saturated fat is apparently more likely to promote accumulation of liver fat and visceral fat -- both of which are associated with diabetes and heart disease -- than unsaturated fat."
Food for thought?
This is from a blog I follow. The author has been managing his T2 diabetes without medication for 13 years... yes, that's right, 13 years!
He does so, simply by diet and exercise alone. He blogs on his progress, and seems, to me at least, to have a very balanced approach to management of his diabetes.
He has experimented over those 13 years with different diets and exercise, and tested his blood to see the effect. So he has a lot of experience, and as such, knows what works for him and what doesn't. Remember we are all different, but this subject may affect us all.
This is from his latest blog, on the subject of a newly published Swedish study. Admittedly, it's a small sample study, only 39 people.... but the results show that saturated fat is apparently more likely to promote accumulation of liver fat and visceral fat than unsaturated fat.
He says:
...... "I no longer believe that saturated fat raises blood cholesterol. I have had ample opportunity to experiment with different diets in the years since my diabetes diagnosis, and I still get the same low cholesterol readings on my lab results regardless of whether my diet is centered around bacon or brussels sprouts. For me, what matters is how much I exercise, not what kind of fats I'm including in my diet; once I started a regular exercise program my cholesterol numbers dropped sharply, and haven't climbed back despite all sorts of different approaches to diet.
However, the mere fact that saturated fat doesn't appear to be the cholesterol-raising villain that we were told it was does not mean saturated fat has no other effects which might be undesirable. I am still willing to be told that evidence has been found for other reasons to minimize saturated fat in the diet.
A new study from Sweden claims to have found such evidence"......
The result: "Despite comparable weight gains between the two diet groups, the surplus consumption of saturated fat caused a markedly greater increase in the amount of fat in the liver and abdomen (especially the fat surrounding the internal organs, visceral fat) in comparison with the surplus consumption of polyunsaturated fat. Moreover the total amount of body fat was greater in the saturated fat group, while, on the other hand, the increase in muscle mass was three times less for those who ate saturated fat compared with those who ate polyunsaturated fat. Thus, gaining weight on excess calories from polyunsaturated fat caused more gain in muscle mass, and less body fat than overeating a similar amount of saturated fat."
"So there you have it. Saturated fat is apparently more likely to promote accumulation of liver fat and visceral fat -- both of which are associated with diabetes and heart disease -- than unsaturated fat."
Food for thought?