• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Planned sugar tax will lower obesity and improve childrens health, say scientists

DCUK NewsBot

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,059
The planned sugar tax in the UK will significantly improve the health of children and reduce the number of people who become obese, a study suggests. A levy on sugary drinks is due to be introduced in April 2018 which will tax the soft drinks industry for products that contain over 5g of sugar per 100ml. Scientists from the University of Oxford say this tax will greatly reduce the incidences of type 2 diabetes caused by obesity. In this new study, they looked to predict the effects of the levy by mapping a realistic better and worse case scenario for health. Their study, published in the Lancet Public Health journal, modelled three possible reactions the soft drinks industry would have to the levy and what the likely impact would be on the health of the UK population. These scenarios were reformulating drinks to lower sugar content, raising the price of sugary drinks and encouraging consumers to switch to lower sugar drinks. The study's modelling revealed that a 30 per cent reduction in sugar content of all high-sugar drinks (more than 8g of sugar per 100ml) could lead to 144,000 fewer children and adults with obesity, 19,000 fewer cases of type 2 diabetes each year, and 269,000 fewer cases of tooth decay. The theorised reaction of passing on the cost of the levy to consumers resulted in a 20 per cent increase in the price of high and mid-sugar (containing 5-8g of sugar per 100ml) drinks. The researchers predicted this would lead to 81,600 fewer obese adults and children, 10,800 cases of type 2 diabetes, and 149,000 cases of decaying teeth. "The good news is that our study suggests that all of the most likely industry responses ... have the potential to improve health," said lead author Adam Briggs. "The extent of the health benefits of the tax will depend on industry's response. We must therefore be vigilant to ensure the food industry acts to remove sugar from soft drinks, and that where the tax is passed on to consumers, it increases the price of targeted products only - drinks with high levels of sugar." Co-author Susan Jebb believes the direction of the levy is clear, but stressed it will not be enough on its own to solve the growing rates of obesity and type 2 diabetes in the UK. "This levy will have a positive impact, especially on children's health," she said. "But we need to consider how to take effective action to reduce other sources of sugar in children's diets, notably confectionery, which has so far been relatively overlooked."

Continue reading...
 
I have a bad reaction to artificial sweeteners, until recently I have been able to buy an orange squash that was only sweetened with sugar and was therefore OK for me to have very occasionally. I notice now that it 'has a new recipe', in other words even that one has artificial sweeteners. Ironically it was these sweeteners that helped me on my way to becoming T2 as I drank too many of them in the past believing them to be healthy and not knowing that they increased insulin resistance and obesity. It seems the 'experts' don't know this either. I think this move is crazy. I wouldn't mind paying a few extra pence for a bottle of the real stuff a few times a year, but now it simply won't be available.

Lucozade has been used by some T1s as a hypo treatment, yet now the sugar content is to be reduced. This is crazy too. I believe the tax should be paid by the consumer not the drinks companies and then at least we could still chose to have the sugary version if we need it.
 
I agree @zand I think it's going to be harder and harder to find drinks free of artificial sweeteners.

I also doubt this move will help child obesity much. You can't solve a multi-cause problem with a headline-grabbing solution.
 
Over a million tonnes of sugar cane was crushed in the Bundaberg region this season (June to December).

Shed loads of raw sugar for export out at Bundaberg Port, and lots of molasses to make Bundy rum with.

We do not want a sugar tax here as it will effect jobs in the regions three mills, and the knock on effect to the sugar cane farmers and their employees.
 
What will their excuses be when their predictions on reducing obesity and diabetes don't quite match the reality. Removing one aspect of a problem doesn't mean you have provided the solution.
 
I've just had my first experience, with the dreaded reduced sugar in lucozade. Nipped into Asda with my hubby to grab a few things, went hypo so while waiting in the que told hubby I'm going car feeling low need my lucozade. Hubby says here you r love handed me a lucozade on the stand by the check out. Started drinking it got to half way down where I'm normally feeling ok. Checked bottle it's the no sugar arrrr. Bottle look exactly the same except for a tiny writing saying no calories. Got to my car drank a real bottle full of sugar. Panick over but while I'm hypo I am easily confused. And just reach out for lucozade as I have done for the past 40 years this no sugar one is really gonna cause terrible prob for us. As it did for me today.
 
A sugar tax will not stop people eating sugar any more than a tobacco tax stopped anyone from smoking. Seems like a money grab to me.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…