The irony being Boris wanted schools open so parents could go back to work. Simple as that. Bet he didn't consider that children picking up the virus at school could mean people not being able to work!!
Big discussions on our Whatsapp work feed tonight,. A diabetic colleague of mine, who wasn't at all worried, is now very worried because she has symptoms which she hopes is a cold! She got knocked by the Caretaker who insists the school is more safe than other schools, which is a bit of a fallacy to be fair considering none of our students wear masks! Seems like you are not allowed to speak out due to "scaremongering" was his phrase. Nice bloke to be fair but bang out of order on that one. I kept quiet but did offer some advice to my colleague and she has a consultant so is talking to her on Monday. Will be very interesting to see what her consultant says.
Things certainly are heating up! I think as always it's the uncertainty that's stressful. Infections are rising on my part of the south coast,nothing like some areas of the country though.
It will be interesting to see how your colleagues consultant views situation.
A week ago I contacted one of the managing directors of my employers. She has a reputation of being quite fair. Of course this has meant supplying the whole sequence of events yet again.Going through the whole sorry tale their actions, or lack of them become even more apparent.
Interestingly now the care home by the end of the week will be down to 7 residents. Another colleague who is high risk and who not shielded but has been unwell due to her condition also wonders where we stand in all of this.
Will we be transferred? Made redundant?
Sorry I havent got reference but I think it was Dr Tam in the papers yesterday saying that he felt that although the government hands,face,space message was strong the main emphasis should be on space. Due to its aerosol nature the best prevention is to be 2 metres away supported by the other two.
Pretty tricky in a school or care home,although at moment I think you stand a better chance in a care home!
There have been reports from disability charities on the news this week about the dilemma faced by those who are high risk in the workplace. There have been grumbling that the government will increase the numbers of shielding by two million. I wonder if that will be blanket groups or a more targeted risk assessment,age,gender,comorbidities etc?
My managing director has indeed suggested that I contact my Dr and get signed off sick again! I think that's a first,never known an employer do that!
It does seem to be increasingly a suggestion. Maybe its viewed as the best option? The guidance for Covid safe workplaces seems to be problematical. No one seems sure of the real situation in a particular area until people become ill.
I do find it rather amusing when presenters etc question why more vulnerable groups are not being hospitalized and view it as a sign that all is ok. Well of course numbers are on the rise and we will see how it stands by the end of the month. We do know more about how this virus affects people. On the whole vulnerable groups are probably imprisoned in care homes or where they can adhering to strict social distancing.
It's a dreadful position to be in. You are at the mercy of a government that shows no mercy and doesnt acknowledge mistakes. Even on this site there can be an element of mockery or dismissal as being unnecessarily afraid or negative.
Some people have been able to return to work in relative safety, their environment is reasonably covid safe,maybe they are not there full time and can work from home.
For those who work in frontline jobs where they spend long hours in poorly ventilated spaces with people who cant or wont socially distance whether it's a school, health care environment or factory it is a whole different ballgame.
Those who are lucky enough not to face those conditions need to spend a few minutes imagining what it's like. If you see a crowded bus/pub/cafe/ shop you have a choice not to enter.
There are strict limitations on how many people can meet together indoors and outdoors. It's now actually against the law to break them.
It's not against the law for a person at high risk to sit in a room with 30plus people with an increasing risk of them being asymptomatic or infected with PPE that offers only basic protection if its available.
Those that find this unacceptable are made to feel they are making a fuss or trouble makers.
Madness.