So says an article in The Times today. Unfortunately it is behind a paywall. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/...-at-greater-risk-of-type-2-diabetes-b2g3zq6nj a quote from the article - "People who did not participate in clubs or other group activities had a much higher chance of having type 2 diabetes than those who did " So, not much chance for a Billy-no-mates like me
Becoming socially isolated (for whatever reason) is different than being unsociable as is becoming lonely in old age. Are we being given the added moniker to 'Fat and Lazy' by being 'Unsociable' now?
I remember an article about not eating in a sociable and pack-like animal way caused diabetes or was being mooted by sociologist, anyway. Not eating regularly was suppose to have been the point to prove in that article. Same with this one?
Strangely I am more detached from my kin because of diabetes rather than I'm the black wolf of family which causes me to suffer with diabetes! I've sort out new kin. You are my diabetic family! So no not unsocialable. However, in the wild I would have been attacked and maybe eaten by my family due to diabetes if I'd been another species!
Thanks to my screen resolution and where I was on the page, that's where your posted ended when I read it. Thanks for the imagery! I like to think that when I go, my body will serve a purpose, possibly that one! I just hope my means of departure doesn't involve my family attacking me. They have been looking at me funny recently thought. Hmmmm....
I have to say I love these correlations and the attempts to explain them, even though it may be futile (even if it turns out there is a causal relationship). I've just found another study comparing personality with glycemic control: https://jdmdonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40200-016-0281-3 It suggests that "Extraversion and conscientiousness can help control blood sugar while anxiety and negative emotions have detrimental effects on glycemic control". That possibly ties in with the study in this thread; I'd guess extraverted people are much more likely to engage in group activities. Are unsociable people more likely to have negative emotions and anxiety? I don't know...
Fortunately, i already have quite impressive glucose tolerance weirdness going on. And I had it loooonnnngggggg before my Party Animal tendencies got bored of glitter balls and curled up with a good book. So i am glad to continue my unsociable Grinch-like spurning of clubs, societies and team games. - with the added benefit that it will protect me from all those contactbourne bugs and airbourne viruses that the sociable herd seem to cultivate and swap with such enthusiasm.
One thing is for sure, whatever our health problems are there are times in everyone's life when we need support. We are social animals and whether we choose to isolate ourselves or have that isolation thrust upon us, we do not fare well.
Next week in The Times (or any other newspaper): read all about how those social party animal types will be at a higher risk of getting T2 than anti-clubber groupy grumpy-guts, like me. I joined one group of bellringers, hoping for camaraderie, a chance to learn a new skill, make new friends, and a pint afterwards down the pub. (Ok, the last might have been the clincher). Ha! All very cliquey and miserable they were too!
I am sure I could put a study together that concludes that you are more likely to have T2 if you wear black shoes Just ignore the fact that black is the most common colour for shoes
I have to say I've noticed a very strong correlation between diabetes and people on this forum. I don't mean to be alarmist, but I do think there may be a link.