Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
Blood Monitors Compared
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spiker" data-source="post: 540947" data-attributes="member: 102150"><p>Purely on accuracy, I thought this was interesting:</p><p> </p><p><em>The Abbott [Freestyle Lite and particularly Freedom Lite] meters score highly for having the highest number of readings 90 of 100 within 5% of actual and 100% of readings within 10% of actual. By comparison, the Accu-Chek Compact Plus scored 69 of 100 readings within 5% - a result that is not as impressive, but is still leading the pack. That means 31 out of 100 readings will be more than 5% wrong or wrong ... It did score okay for 94/100 readings within 10%, </em></p><p> </p><p>which is a blogger's summary of this report:</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.jdst.org/September2012/PDF/VOL-6-5-ORG2-FRECKMANN.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jdst.org/September2012/PDF/VOL-6-5-ORG2-FRECKMANN.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>The OneTouch Verio (but not the Verio Pro), and the AccuChek Active and Go also come out very well in these tests (look at the rightmost column in the results). Most of the other AccuChek meters came out similar to the Compact Plus, ahead of the pack but behind the 2 best Abbot and AccuChek meters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spiker, post: 540947, member: 102150"] Purely on accuracy, I thought this was interesting: [I]The Abbott [Freestyle Lite and particularly Freedom Lite] meters score highly for having the highest number of readings 90 of 100 within 5% of actual and 100% of readings within 10% of actual. By comparison, the Accu-Chek Compact Plus scored 69 of 100 readings within 5% - a result that is not as impressive, but is still leading the pack. That means 31 out of 100 readings will be more than 5% wrong or wrong ... It did score okay for 94/100 readings within 10%, [/I] which is a blogger's summary of this report: [url]http://www.jdst.org/September2012/PDF/VOL-6-5-ORG2-FRECKMANN.pdf[/url] The OneTouch Verio (but not the Verio Pro), and the AccuChek Active and Go also come out very well in these tests (look at the rightmost column in the results). Most of the other AccuChek meters came out similar to the Compact Plus, ahead of the pack but behind the 2 best Abbot and AccuChek meters. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Management
Blood Glucose Monitoring
Blood Monitors Compared
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…