Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Codefree glucose meter readings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Oldvatr" data-source="post: 1060308" data-attributes="member: 196898"><p>My two meters track each other for averaged values within +/- 2 mmol/L Day to day they can differ by up to 8 mmol/L on a repeated reading. I take both meters with me when i see the vampire, then I compare the result from the lab on the blood taken at the same time.</p><p>Actually I find that HBA1c vs meter to be quite steady and within 1 mmol/L. The SD reads 1 mmol high, the NEO 1 mmol low, which is what the average readings at that time show. There is no way one can verify calibration because the so called solutions do not specify their titrated value. My NEO also tracked both my XCEEDs very well, much better than the SD, so i know the SD is not reliable. The reason why I suspect theSD of not reading to 15% is that i get errors of 4 or 5 mmol/L between the meters so one or both is outside the 15% Since the NEO is more consistent, i tend to give it the doubt. It is not very comforting when I get the symptoms of a hypo, and the NEO reads 3.7, and the SD reads 6.4. i know which one I trust more.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Oldvatr, post: 1060308, member: 196898"] My two meters track each other for averaged values within +/- 2 mmol/L Day to day they can differ by up to 8 mmol/L on a repeated reading. I take both meters with me when i see the vampire, then I compare the result from the lab on the blood taken at the same time. Actually I find that HBA1c vs meter to be quite steady and within 1 mmol/L. The SD reads 1 mmol high, the NEO 1 mmol low, which is what the average readings at that time show. There is no way one can verify calibration because the so called solutions do not specify their titrated value. My NEO also tracked both my XCEEDs very well, much better than the SD, so i know the SD is not reliable. The reason why I suspect theSD of not reading to 15% is that i get errors of 4 or 5 mmol/L between the meters so one or both is outside the 15% Since the NEO is more consistent, i tend to give it the doubt. It is not very comforting when I get the symptoms of a hypo, and the NEO reads 3.7, and the SD reads 6.4. i know which one I trust more. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Diabetes Discussions
Codefree glucose meter readings
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…