Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Links to studies supporting Low Carb/showing calorie restriction ineffective?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mbaker" data-source="post: 2100739" data-attributes="member: 256617"><p>I dislike studies. They claim to be scientific. The facts of many of these we know to be frankly bin material. David Katz stated loads in a debate with Nina Teicholz recently; to the unitiated this was impressive and he did get the "win".....but did he. Not in my view due to the reliance on epidemiology.</p><p></p><p>Within the next month I am bound to read I have one foot in the grave by an established university study. I think the scientific method has been hijacked, and the new king is Engineering methodology.</p><p></p><p>I believe anecdotes, backed by medical records are hard to argue against, such as the Type 1 Grit results. I have time for Vollek and Phinney's Faster study as they properly fat adapted participants and showed fat burning changes conclusively.</p><p></p><p>Virta health's 2 year results are perhaps one of my favourites, as they didn't randomise in the traditional sense, they were not entirely prescriptive I.e. you must eat this much veg, meat, fruit etc - there's was a more realistic real world scenario. The only real control was ketone measuring.</p><p></p><p>I like results, with measures, over time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mbaker, post: 2100739, member: 256617"] I dislike studies. They claim to be scientific. The facts of many of these we know to be frankly bin material. David Katz stated loads in a debate with Nina Teicholz recently; to the unitiated this was impressive and he did get the "win".....but did he. Not in my view due to the reliance on epidemiology. Within the next month I am bound to read I have one foot in the grave by an established university study. I think the scientific method has been hijacked, and the new king is Engineering methodology. I believe anecdotes, backed by medical records are hard to argue against, such as the Type 1 Grit results. I have time for Vollek and Phinney's Faster study as they properly fat adapted participants and showed fat burning changes conclusively. Virta health's 2 year results are perhaps one of my favourites, as they didn't randomise in the traditional sense, they were not entirely prescriptive I.e. you must eat this much veg, meat, fruit etc - there's was a more realistic real world scenario. The only real control was ketone measuring. I like results, with measures, over time. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Food and Nutrition
Low-carb Diet Forum
Links to studies supporting Low Carb/showing calorie restriction ineffective?
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…