Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to Thread
Guest, we'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the
Diabetes Forum Survey 2024 »
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Updated NICE T1 guidelines published
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="donnellysdogs" data-source="post: 934568" data-attributes="member: 17713"><p>The trouble is that NICE have to go by the "official" route of costings... And if thats a sensor lasting say a week.. Thats it. If they haven't been approved for a longer period it invalidates any arguments that anybody can put forward.</p><p></p><p>Ie just as a small different example. Degludec that CCGs have double red for prescribing. Even though I can prove that it would be cheaper its only based upon assimptions that I would be using xx less units, 1 needle officially per day instead of 2. This had to go before the prescribing manager of the CCG even though it is officially sort of available through NICE.</p><p></p><p>NICE have to bear in mind facts and not "what if's" and then the Prescribing Managers of CCGs would also base their availability on facts too. Extending sensors just won't come in to the equation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="donnellysdogs, post: 934568, member: 17713"] The trouble is that NICE have to go by the "official" route of costings... And if thats a sensor lasting say a week.. Thats it. If they haven't been approved for a longer period it invalidates any arguments that anybody can put forward. Ie just as a small different example. Degludec that CCGs have double red for prescribing. Even though I can prove that it would be cheaper its only based upon assimptions that I would be using xx less units, 1 needle officially per day instead of 2. This had to go before the prescribing manager of the CCG even though it is officially sort of available through NICE. NICE have to bear in mind facts and not "what if's" and then the Prescribing Managers of CCGs would also base their availability on facts too. Extending sensors just won't come in to the equation. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post Reply
Home
Forums
Diabetes Discussion
Type 1 Diabetes
Updated NICE T1 guidelines published
Top
Bottom
Find support, ask questions and share your experiences. Ad free.
Join the community »
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn More.…