This is true, and also a real fasting test should be taken after sleeping so that it includes the early morning glucose release. How the body handles this morning rise is a very telling measure of insulin resistance.
Then, of course, there are many folk (I am one) that see no rise at all after sleeping. Flat all night in fact. My rise never began until I had been up and about for a period of time.
This indicates that you have a good level of insulin sensitivity
EDIT: misread the past tense of the last part of your post...
I’ve no idea what I do overnight never having tried a libre and unwillingness to wake myself just to test. But my waking figure is always less than an hour later but before any food or drink. Like me my liver is not a “lark”, both perform better as “owls”
I keep promising myself a gift of at least one sensor to do just that but then read about issues with them and am put off by an expensive failure possility. There’s no danger of repeated alarms all through the night for curiosity sake. Love my sleep too much for that.I'd be more inclined to investigate nocturnal BGs using a CGM or flash monitor sytem than needlessly setting an alarm & disturbing a sleep pattern. Which in turn could throw out the personal metabolic cycle of things?
This indicates that you have a good level of insulin sensitivity
EDIT: misread the past tense of the last part of your post...
EDIT: In T1 I would expect a rise, because the pancreas isn’t trying to keep up with the normal morning function of the liver to secrete glucose. In T2 I would expect to see a rise if insulin sensitivity is poor, which it invariably would be. It’s all sliding scales of course, and very few of us will have an identical experience or even perception of what is happening.
All right call me a fibber for 1 mmol/molJohn, you may like to check your figures.
HbA1c under 42 is non-diabetic
42 to 47 is pre-diabetic
48 and above is diabetic.
https://www.diabetes.co.uk/images/article_images/DiagnosticCriteriaPrediabetes.png
Right, but you could also do it normally, take readings before your meals and two hours after your meals. If you eat for example 4 times per day then you will have 8 measurements per day. This will result in your glucometer to collect all the data needed to show you correct monthly averages. If you take your readings once a week at random times and just out of the blue then of course your meter will never have any accurate monthly figures.
I agree that the HbA1c tests are more accurate, but you do not do them every day at home, therefore I am trying to make the most of my glucometer and to use it / understand its readings to the best of my ability. I also think that an idea of approximate values and figures is not quite right here.
Hi
I think you kind of mix up before meal reading and fasting blood glucose.
A fasting blood test has to be done 8 hours after last meal, were 4.0-5.9 are non-diabetic, 6.0-6.9 mmol are pre-diabetic, and any fasting reading over 7.0 mmol are considered diabetic.
Before meal reading can vary by how often and how much you eat. So pre-meal reading do not tell much unless you have really high blood sugar.
Also 5.5 to 5.9 mmol are not of any concern as I see it, really. Sounds perfectly normal to me
Of course it might be different guidlines from country to country, but where I live 5.5-5.9 fasting are not considered pre-diabetic, if that’s a relief
It just doesn't sound right to me. When a bone is broken it is broken in Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, Great Britain, you name the country, anywhere. It cannot be considered broken in Italy and not broken in the US. Why is it different with diabetes? Hope you see my point.
Thank you so much for your input, Emile. I appreciate. It's useful to know but it definitely differs from country to country and possibly from doctor to doctor. All these guides and charts found online have different advices.. each.. some say 5.5 is diabetic, others say 6.0 is completely healthy. That's actually why I asked my initial question in this thread. It would be really weird if some countries said that 2+2=4 and some other countries sticked to the rule that 2+2=5. I believe that all the doctors worldwide should come up with just one exact number, not some approximate values and figures. It just doesn't sound right to me. When a bone is broken it is broken in Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Canada, Great Britain, you name the country, anywhere. It cannot be considered broken in Italy and not broken in the US. Why is it different with diabetes? Hope you see my point.
Does fasting include sleeping? Let's say 10 hours of fasting where 7 out of them would be spent asleep? I can easily stay without any food for a day or two. I basically never feel hungry. All I need is water so I can easily do 8 hours of fasting during the day time.
I'm guessing that your HbA1c levels are pretty good so what is there to change..?I am trying to make sense of waking-up fasting readings which average 5.5 compared to day time (at least 8 hours fasting - only plain water ingested) of around 4.7.
Of course the early morning readings are higher because of the 'dawn effect' but what do I read into it if my day time readings are significantly better?
In the morning I have to get up early as I make my wife her breakfast and she has an early start while I work at home. I average avout 7 hours of sleep and the sleep monitor suggests it's good quality sleep - I sleep easily.
I'm on a very low carb diet and have been for several years. I also walk around 12,000 steps on average daily as well as do some weights (8kg dumbbells).
I'm guessing that your HbA1c levels are pretty good so what is there to change..?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?