Ronancastled
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,234
- Type of diabetes
- Type 2
- Treatment type
- Diet only
I bought my Codefree some 5 years ago. I get exactly this same problem no matter what the other meter is. I find I get readings that average over months to be always 1.2 mmol/l higher than my other meter, but the other meters track each other. However, like you I get rogue high readings from the SD that can be up to 10 mmol.l higher. Even on a retest. When this happens repeat tests are repeating the same huge difference. I find it is the readings just after eating that tend to trigger this difference, and suspect that there is some element of the food that the SD detects that the other meters do not.(probably Malitol) The test strips and electronics use different enzyme reactions, so this can happen due to different chemistries.After I was diagnosed I purchased a SD Codefree online as it seemed to have the cheapest strips.
Like a muppet I managed to buy an American version mg/dl but dividing by 18 sorts that.
I began noticing that one batch of sticks could read 1+mmol/L higher than the previous but as they were only 10p a strip I'd order a new batch of 50 & chuck the bad ones.
About 2 months ago I purchased a backup Accu-chek that has a cassette which can take 50 tests.
Much more expensive, works out 70p per test but worth it if your worried about a bad reading.
So last week was my 3 month scheduled lab test so I brought both meters in the car.
Straight after leaving the surgery I took 2 readings on both meters from the same drop of blood.
Accu-chek: 4.7 & 4.8
SD Codefree: 119(6.6) & 106(5.9)
The lab result came back 2 days later at 4.7 so turns out the Accu-chek was deadly accurate.
My previous batch of Codefree strips were a lot closer to the Accu-chek readings but this new batch are way off again.
Perhaps we get what we pay for.
Anybody else notice the same ?
After I was diagnosed I purchased a SD Codefree online as it seemed to have the cheapest strips.
Like a muppet I managed to buy an American version mg/dl but dividing by 18 sorts that.
I began noticing that one batch of sticks could read 1+mmol/L higher than the previous but as they were only 10p a strip I'd order a new batch of 50 & chuck the bad ones.
About 2 months ago I purchased a backup Accu-chek that has a cassette which can take 50 tests.
Much more expensive, works out 70p per test but worth it if your worried about a bad reading.
So last week was my 3 month scheduled lab test so I brought both meters in the car.
Straight after leaving the surgery I took 2 readings on both meters from the same drop of blood.
Accu-chek: 4.7 & 4.8
SD Codefree: 119(6.6) & 106(5.9)
The lab result came back 2 days later at 4.7 so turns out the Accu-chek was deadly accurate.
My previous batch of Codefree strips were a lot closer to the Accu-chek readings but this new batch are way off again.
Perhaps we get what we pay for.
Anybody else notice the same ?
Your 3 month scheduled lab test (HbA1c) returns your average blood glucose over the past 2 to 3 months in mmol/mol (or possibly a percentage). Your spot check returns your glucose reading in mmol/L. The units are not the same and cannot be compared like for like.
With many spot check results you can derive an average reading that may come out somewhere near the HbA1c value.
So ignoring the lab results (well done by the way - good result whether it's a percentage or mmol/mol) , all test meters sold in the UK/EU are required to conform to ISO standard 15197:2013 and must be accurate to within +/-15% for 95% of the readings (which allows for some rogue results) so it's entirely possible that your true glucose reading was around 5.7mmol/L and both meters are roughly within specification, with the Accu-Check reading lower than actual and the Codefree reading higher than actual.
Don't expect too much from home test meters.
Point I was making is that the Accu-chek spot result was 100% accurate to the lab result, the lab blood having been drawn minutes before.
What result did you get from the laboratory ? What units was it in?
I have been getting exactly the same offset (1.2 mmol/l) for over 5 years now. I have compared mine against Abbot Xceed (2 different meters and strip packs), and my Abbot Neo that replaced the Xceed, and now my Caresense Dual. ALL of them had the same 1.2 mmol average offset difference, and always with the Code-free reading high. It is very rare when it has read lower, and on these occasions, it was always shown to be a misread on retry.Disappointed, just tried codefree and it seems over 1.2 mmol/l higher than my normal readings, and it confirmed when i checked against Finetest Lite.
However, its panic to see a reading of 6.8 as an 8.1. I almost declared my wife diabetic as well!I have been getting exactly the same offset (1.2 mmol/l) for over 5 years now. I have compared mine against Abbot Xceed (2 different meters and strip packs), and my Abbot Neo that replaced the Xceed, and now my Caresense Dual. ALL of them had the same 1.2 mmol average offset difference, and always with the Code-free reading high. It is very rare when it has read lower, and on these occasions, it was always shown to be a misread on retry.
There are others doing this comparison that do not experience this problem so it seems to be the meter rather than the strips. My Codefree can be up to 4 mmol/l adrift and for it to retest this high again, so I suspect it is something in the chemical reaction to blood composition that gives these errors (hematocrit for instance?)
It is as if the Code-free is calibrated to whole blood rather than plasma calibration which is also 1.2 factor but the blurb sheet claims plasma.
The problem is that a 1.2 error is within the ISO requirements for the meter, so the supplier refuses to replace the meter as faulty. As oit is a fixed offset, I can live with it, and I set my spreadsheet to adjust accordingly.
It is even worse seeing a 5.1 while having the symptoms of a hypo, and needing to drive somewhere, By DVLA rules, the 5.1 allows me to get behind the wheel, but a 3.9 is hypoland. I have been there.However, its panic to see a reading of 6.8 as an 8.1. I almost declared my wife diabetic as well!
Funny you say that about your wife.However, its panic to see a reading of 6.8 as an 8.1. I almost declared my wife diabetic as well!
After I was diagnosed I purchased a SD Codefree online as it seemed to have the cheapest strips.
Like a muppet I managed to buy an American version mg/dl but dividing by 18 sorts that.
I began noticing that one batch of sticks could read 1+mmol/L higher than the previous but as they were only 10p a strip I'd order a new batch of 50 & chuck the bad ones.
About 2 months ago I purchased a backup Accu-chek that has a cassette which can take 50 tests.
Much more expensive, works out 70p per test but worth it if your worried about a bad reading.
So last week was my 3 month scheduled lab test so I brought both meters in the car.
Straight after leaving the surgery I took 2 readings on both meters from the same drop of blood.
Accu-chek: 4.7 & 4.8
SD Codefree: 119(6.6) & 106(5.9)
The lab result came back 2 days later at 4.7 so turns out the Accu-chek was deadly accurate.
My previous batch of Codefree strips were a lot closer to the Accu-chek readings but this new batch are way off again.
Perhaps we get what we pay for.
Anybody else notice the same ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?