That's great news. My worry is, I was told with my readings (from hypos to hypers), even with H1bac 7.2, that I could lose my sight in a few years.My result last year was that I had some degree of retinopathy in left eye which is obviously scary and I do remember slight pain in my eye when my eye moved left to right. However today’s result showed no signs of retinopathy- amazed- no pain now but didn’t realise it could rectify itself?
I was Type1 from 1959-2013 (pancreas/kidney transplant) I had never had a proper eye inspection until 1978, my vision in 1971 became blurry on several occasions, causing me to go to a standard optician, who could find nothing wrong. It would then correct itself (I found out later that this was due to better blood sugar results). From 1979-1983 I had a total of 7 laser treatments in both eyes. I am still reading, typing (!) and driving all these years later. Good average control has certainly played a part. But like all diabetics, you cannot avoid the blips which come with infection or serious stress. Good luck!I’ve been T2 diabetic for roughly 12 years. Slightly uncontrolled for 10 years as I didn’t realise how serious diabetes really was. I changed everything a couple of years ago when I was told I needed to start insulin alongside my other meds. However just before Christmas I went for my routine eye screening and got the surprising result that I had retinopathy. At the moment tho they don’t feel it needs any action which I’m relieved about and don’t seem to have any problems with my vision apart from floaters . In fact I can see better without my glasses, apart from close up.
Could a really strict diet reverse this or is it bound to progress cos I’ve read about the treatment and it sounds scary
I'm confused on this one too. As I thought I understood it (and I clearly don't) the scan works in two ways. The first way is it can detect recent micro bleeds on the retina, think of them like miniscule scabs that mark where a tiny blood vessel has bled. The second is by comparing the scan with a previous scan it can detect changes. I had thought that the damage was permanent though once it happens. There are treatments but no cure.My result last year was that I had some degree of retinopathy in left eye which is obviously scary and I do remember slight pain in my eye when my eye moved left to right. However today’s result showed no signs of retinopathy- amazed- no pain now but didn’t realise it could rectify itself?
In my case it showed no damage at all, and I asked the ophthalmologist for clarification, he said that the eyes can repair themselves (like a liver) provided the damage was not too severe or prolonged which could cause scarring.I'm confused on this one too. As I thought I understood it (and I clearly don't) the scan works in two ways. The first way is it can detect recent micro bleeds on the retina, think of them like miniscule scabs that mark where a tiny blood vessel has bled. The second is by comparing the scan with a previous scan it can detect changes. I had thought that the damage was permanent though once it happens. There are treatments but no cure.
So when they say no retinopathy detected, do they mean no new eye damage or no damage at all?
I have my own scan coming up soon and I'm a bit nervous. I've been having some odd visual disturbances lately and while Google says they're probably just related to my age, the nervousness is hard to dispel.
I have the same but IanBish is correct. They are trying to reword results from a retinopathy scan as the letter can be scary!I don't have any experience of retinopathy, but a few people here (I forget who) have said that it improved greatly when they reduced their HbA1c.
Indeed, microbleeds come from microaneurisms (swollen and leaky blood vessels) which grow in the eye where they shouldn't (neovascularization). Hence the bleeds will be cleared away, but the new blood vessels will keep leaking and need to be stopped. Bad BG control contributes to this but can be reversed by getting better control and/or therapy such as laser treatment or anti-VEGF antibody injections.I'm confused on this one too. As I thought I understood it (and I clearly don't) the scan works in two ways. The first way is it can detect recent micro bleeds on the retina, think of them like miniscule scabs that mark where a tiny blood vessel has bled. The second is by comparing the scan with a previous scan it can detect changes. I had thought that the damage was permanent though once it happens. There are treatments but no cure.
So when they say no retinopathy detected, do they mean no new eye damage or no damage at all?
I have my own scan coming up soon and I'm a bit nervous. I've been having some odd visual disturbances lately and while Google says they're probably just related to my age, the nervousness is hard to dispel.
Could I please ask what type of retinopathy you had? I am newly diagnosed and my eye screening has shown retinopathy pre proliferation and I am really worried I am going to go blind.Diabetic retinopathy is something worth avoiding.
I've been treated with eylea injections and had one eye lazered
Eylea was superceded with a new injection treatment which is very much better, treatment went from every five weeks to currently 3 monthly.
The only way to avoid this is good glucose control.
Due to a CGM and diet I now have good control and my eyesight has returned to a prescription that I had 20 years ago.
Previously my eyesight was all over the place, blurry, sometimes, actually better than normal on one notable occasion for a few weeks ( I thought I was cured lol)
The injections are not a pleasant experience.
With eylea you could write off the whole day plus the next one or two due to the effects.
Sitting in a darkened room, blind with sore eyes and a migraine for two days isn't fun.
Plus infection is always a risk with anything invasive.
Finally the DVLA might want you to take a peripheral vision test.
All this can be avoided with blood glucose control.
It is not an inevitable outcome from having diabetes.
I was an idiot. I got lots of complications through avoiding insulin and living in denial about my diabetes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?