I would say confusing rather than conflicting - there is a lot of complex stuff going on, and it can be very confusing when you are new to it.Boyfriend said:Thanks for that. Like i say everyone seems to give conflicting advice.
Here you are confusing two very different things - treatment for hypoglycaemia (i.e. low blood sugar) with diabetes control. In non-diabetic people there is a sophisticated system in place for regulating blood sugar levels. In diabetics this system break down, and the regulation has to be done "manually" - by some combination of exercise, diet, drugs and insulin. This is important, because if blood sugars go out of the normal range bad things happen. If they go too low you get a situation called "hypoglycaemia" (often called a "hypo"). This can be extremely dangerous, but fortunately is easy to treat. Your first-aider correctly described the early symptoms of a hypo - if it isn't corrected and blood sugars continue to fall the victim will go into a coma and will eventually die. Correcting it means eating! The best thing to eat is glucose in a liquid form because that is very rapidly absorbed (if at risk of hypos then it is probably sensible to carry something like a bottle of lucozade ). Not all diabetics are at risk of hypos - it is mostly a problem that affects Type 1s and Type 2s on insulin or some drugs. Diet-controlled Type 2s are extremely unlikely to get a hypo.Boyfriend said:Last week i was on a first aid course and i asked the woman what were the signs of a low blood sugar, she said, anxiety, cold and clammy skin, shakiness etc, she said that he needed sugar straight away and once he has settled, he needed lots of carbohydrates....but from what i have noted on here carbohydrates seem to be a no-no......HELP?
A good question. Did the optician know that he is a newly diagnosed diabetic? If this was known, then your boyfriend really should have been advised to wait until his eyes had settled down (and if that is the case, then you probably have cause for complaint to the optician). If the optician didn't know then he or she can't be blamed for just trying to fix the problem that was there on the day.Boyfriend said:And why has the optician prescribed his glasses for reading when his eyesight is so blurred....there doesnt seem to be any consistency.
There aren't obvious immediate symptoms, as there are when they go too low - that is why most diabetics have glucose monitors and test their blood. The long term symptoms are the thirst and tiredness, but this takes days or week to develop. Also, again unlike blood sugars going too low, it isn't easy to fix it instantly. Taking some extra exercise might help bring them down a bit, but the real solution is the long term management strategy: exercise; diet; drugs if recommended by a doctor and finally insulin if a doctor considers that necessary.Boyfriend said:Also what are the signs of high blood sugar and what should you do when this occurs?
Please don't panic - you are doing exactly the right thing by learning about diabetes. There is a lot to learn, but it really is worth the effort. Diabetes is pretty much unique amongst serious diseases in that it is possible learn to manage it so well that it doesn't have to have any serious impact upon your life. This isn't an easy thing to do - you have to find a good medical team, and strike right balance between medication and lifestyle, but it is possible and it is something that is well worth striving for. Unfortunately, you may well find that not everyone in the medical profession knows as much about the latest thinking on diabetes as one might hope - and so for that reason each patient really does have to become his or her own expert.Boyfriend said:God this is a minefield.
Absolutely - you need to have a strategy for testing. A fasting test first thing in the morning will give you a very rough idea of how good overall control was the day before. Right now, that is probably the most important thing. Keep a record of these numbers, and hopefully you will quickly see them falling into single figures. If they don't, then your boyfriend will need to hassle his GP to get his medication sorted out.Boyfriend said:When are the best times to test your BG and also when would you expect them to be high or low i spose that is one big question that i need to understand......otherwise we are just testing willy nilly.
The ideal BG reading before breakfast (or pre-prandial as you will sometimes hear a doctor refer to it when they are trying to blind you with their superior knowledge) is below 7 and ideally between 5 and 6 mmol/l. But from the sound of it, your boyfriend has a long way to go before he reaches that level of control. But don't worry about it. You can't bring BG levels down that low in a hurry - it takes time and a lot of trial and error with diet to find out what things are good for his blood sugar levels and what things aren't. Bringing BG levels up from a hypo can be done quickly. Bringing them down to a controllable level takes time.Boyfriend said:Ok Thanks, i am beginning to understand this a little........So first thing in the morning after fasting how should the BG level be low or what?
After eating your BG will go up. How much it will go up by and how quickly will depend on how much carb and what type of carb has been eaten. All forms of sugar will raise BG within a couple of minutes. Other forms of carb will raise BG more slowly. The glycaemic index (or GI) of a food tells you how quickly or slowly it will convert to blood sugar - low GI foods convert to sugar slowly (45 mins or more), medium GI foods in 15 to 45 mins and high GI foods generally convert within 15 mins.Boyfriend said:and then what normally happens after eating does it go up and then level back down again after a couple of hours if you have eaten properly?
On the contrary - your boyfriend is a very lucky guy to have someone who cares for him as much as you obviously do. He is probably a bit confused by it all but you do need to try to get him out of denial. Problem is that its easy for him while you are doing all the worrying and research for him - he can just pretend it doesn't apply to him! Unfortunately its a familiar path that many of have trodden and years later come to regret it. Its a bit late when you have just had a foot amputated or gone blind to start thinking "I wonder if I should have listened to what they were telling me!".Boyfriend said:Sorry i must sound like a real dimwit but my boyfriend is a little in denial at the moment so i am trying to guide him as much as i can without trying to be overbearing.x
Looks like you are getting on top of this - keep an eye on it, but hopefully the BG will carry on coming down. Then your boyfriends symptoms should abate, and you can concentrate on fine-tuning the diet and developing a sustainable healthy lifestyle.Boyfriend said:last night he tested at 10.6 before his meal and 12.3 just over two hours later. This morning he was 11.4, so it is still high but a great improvement on the day before.
Absolutely, it is all about spotting patterns in the figures.Boyfriend said:hopefully we will begin to see a pattern.
If this was a fasting test, then that would be very high for a non-diabetic. However, the BG of "normal" people can go much higher than this after a meal - the problem with diabetes is the lack of an effective insulin response makes it much slower to come down again. A figure of 7.6 after eating a lot of chocolate sounds perfectly normal to me! If you are at all concerned, then try a fasting test. If your fasting BG is over 7 on more than one occasion, then you should go to see a doctor and get a "proper" test done. BTW although fingerprick tests are useful for monitoring BG control, they should never be used to diagnose diabetes - they are too inaccurate and there is too much that can go wrong. Diabetes is diagnosed in a lab, using blood samples drawn directly from a vein - and that needs to be done by a doctor or nurse.Boyfriend said:well blow me but my result came out at 7.6(from what i have read on here that is quite high for a non-diabetic.....is that true?)
It is not a question of getting a single "true" reading. BG is constantly changing over time, and the important thing is the patterns of that change. After a meal, BG will rise rapidly and then fall back to where you started. To some extent it matters how far it rises, but it is much more important how quickly it drops back. Typically, 1 hour after a meal the BG will be close to its peak and 2 hours after a meal it will be back somewhere close to where it started. However, the types of food, combinations of food and other factors such as exercise and medication can make a big difference. With some meals it can be back down in barely over an hour, others can take four or five hours. If you really want to see what is going on, then you need to take a series of measurements and plot the changes on a graph (the area underneath the curve on the graph is the best measure of the impact that a meal has had). However, you get through a lot of strips like that, and although that sort of experiment might be useful for fine tuning a diet, it isn't something that you should be doing right now. If you are doing a single measurement after a meal then 2 hours is probably the best time to do it - that will typically give you a rough idea of how large a glucose hit you have taken from the meal.Boyfriend said:Are you saying then that it is better to test his BG 3hours after a meal rather than 2 to get a truer reading?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?