Does a child with type 1 diabetes really need DLA? They are not, after all, actually disabled. They need no extra care that costs money?! Just extra time and a little bit of extra attention from their care givers/mum/dad.
The only part of my daughter's care that I am consistently actively involved in is ordering her prescriptions. Everything else she does herself. E.G calculating insulin doses, administering insulin, weighing out her food etc etc. Unless she is poorly, then the level of care she receives from me is upped but still, it doesn't cost any money...
Every child is different, if you have a confident youngster who wants to take charge of their regime then alls well. There are children who need extra help, becoming a teenager doesn't suddenly make your ability change.
I think the point that a child is considered to be under 16 makes them eligible for some DLA. Adults get PIP now. Every child is different, some more responsible and independent then there are others who do need extra help. Children do not stop becoming children at 13 as the DWP seem to think. Appeal if you need help.
Agree @Robinredbreast. I get so irritated with the "benefit scrounger" label that was propagated by the media a long time ago to people with disabilities or people in need of extra care. The family members often give up a lot of their time looking after people that saves the state a lot of money. For the people who think diabetes doesn't have medical or care needs then they are deluding themselves, many lives have been shortened or ruined due to diabetes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?