Hi there,
I very happy after my first review post diagnosis that was due for a couple of months already but had to be delayed. I was diagnosed in january and went straight into a very low carbing diet and metformin which brought my BGs down almost immediately.
I lost two stones and a bit but had to go through a very stressful time between april and june and that brought back almost half the weight (I'm still very overweight)... so I wasn't expecting great results as the blood tests were taken just before I started low carbing again... but to my pleasant surprise here they are:
HbA1c 112 at diagnosis down to 42 mmol/mol
Total Cholesterol 8.8 at diagnosis down to 6.1mmol/mol
Triglycerides 5.95 at diagnosis down to 3.15 mmol/mol
LDL (NA at diagnosis due to high trigs) down to 3.02 mmol/L
HDL 1.09 at diagnosis up to 1.65 mmol/L
Cholesterol Ratio 8.1 at diagnosis down to 3.7
My nurse and doctor were really happy and positive, they are happy with low carbing and in that respect I feel lucky I get full support, although my dietary advice came from myself never from them (they never told me what to eat... I told them what I was doing and that was it)
I am very happy that I didn't experience the increase in cholesterol that people sometimes present while low carbing and losing weight (I was concerned about it), however I am confused about the levels and the word statins been mentioned again by the nurse.
I can't go on statins (neither I want to) but I wonder if I actually do need to bring my cholesterol further down, and would love to hear your opinions. And how could I fight my corner if they insist in me having lower cholesterol.
I think my cholesterol levels improved dramatically (in my opinion) and I suspect that if in the last few months I wouldn't have put the weight back on that the results would have been even better... but life is rarely perfect... they might keep improving as I have started with my low carb lifestyle again although at the moment my weight loss is very very slow in comparison to the first few months.
However, I am always confused about this all: particles size, ratio, total cholesterol issue. From the ratio perspective my life seems to be almost perfect now at 3.7 (ideal been theoretically 3.5-1 as I understand it) but my total cholesterol is still very high at 6.1
I am also confused by the NHS guidelines about LDL been 3 for healthy people and 2 for people at risk (I am at high risk and tick all the boxes), should I be worried of being at 3.02... I feel I shouldn't...
Also, has anybody here while low carbing achieved the total cholesterol at 4 and triglycerides below 1.8 that are the targets? I wonder...
Second all the above, but would add an extra link.Personally, I always disregard the total cholesterol number, as, frankly, it's meaningless. I'm more concerned about the components. My lipids at diagnosis (October 2013)are the first figures on the list below, with the second in May this year.:
Serum lipid levels
Serum cholesterol level 8.2 > 7.4
Serum triglyceride levels 2.45 > 0.82
Serum HDL cholesterol level 1.5 > 2.6
Serum LDL cholesterol level 5.6 > 4.4
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio 5.5 > 2.8
I have spent a lot of time learning about lipids, and have left my GP with lots of reading and notes each time I have seen her, as initially she was most concerned, but only referring to Total. Following these last results, she comment was, "You must be absolutely delighted with those numbers".
Those lipid levels go with HbA1cs at 73 and 30 on the respective dates.
Primarily, in your shoes, I would want to bring my Trigs down further, but low carbing should take care of that. As changes to lipids can take a while to show up in tests, it could be you are on the way to reducing that element anyway. I have never taken statins, or any other diabetes related medication.
I have no idea why you state you can't take statins, although you say your GP would like you to? Why is there a difference there?
Provided you are otherwise healthy (and that is a decently weighted proviso), I would be negotiating a further 3 months of monitoring before starting statins; bearing in mind how slowly changes are reflected in blood tests. Furthermore, I can find very very little, in terms of medical evidence which persuades me statins have much, that has been proven, to offer women, and particularly those of a "certain age". Apologies if that brackets you inappropriately, but I have no idea how old you are, but I am firmly in that bracket. Most research is conducted on male patients, probably because of their increased risk of CVD, but that doesn't comfort me much in terms of the medics' view.
Good luck with it all, and keep reading and talking to your HCPs. If you continue lower carbing, it is likely your trigs, and probably other components will improve at your next review. If you haven't already, I can strongly recommend you invest some time watching some of Professor Sikaris's videos on YouTube. He has a straightforward presentation style and I have learned a lot from him, and his cohorts.
Personally, I always disregard the total cholesterol number, as, frankly, it's meaningless. I'm more concerned about the components. My lipids at diagnosis (October 2013)are the first figures on the list below, with the second in May this year.:
Serum lipid levels
Serum cholesterol level 8.2 > 7.4
Serum triglyceride levels 2.45 > 0.82
Serum HDL cholesterol level 1.5 > 2.6
Serum LDL cholesterol level 5.6 > 4.4
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio 5.5 > 2.8
I have spent a lot of time learning about lipids, and have left my GP with lots of reading and notes each time I have seen her, as initially she was most concerned, but only referring to Total. Following these last results, she comment was, "You must be absolutely delighted with those numbers".
Those lipid levels go with HbA1cs at 73 and 30 on the respective dates.
Primarily, in your shoes, I would want to bring my Trigs down further, but low carbing should take care of that. As changes to lipids can take a while to show up in tests, it could be you are on the way to reducing that element anyway. I have never taken statins, or any other diabetes related medication.
I have no idea why you state you can't take statins, although you say your GP would like you to? Why is there a difference there?
Provided you are otherwise healthy (and that is a decently weighted proviso), I would be negotiating a further 3 months of monitoring before starting statins; bearing in mind how slowly changes are reflected in blood tests. Furthermore, I can find very very little, in terms of medical evidence which persuades me statins have much, that has been proven, to offer women, and particularly those of a "certain age". Apologies if that brackets you inappropriately, but I have no idea how old you are, but I am firmly in that bracket. Most research is conducted on male patients, probably because of their increased risk of CVD, but that doesn't comfort me much in terms of the medics' view.
Good luck with it all, and keep reading and talking to your HCPs. If you continue lower carbing, it is likely your trigs, and probably other components will improve at your next review. If you haven't already, I can strongly recommend you invest some time watching some of Professor Sikaris's videos on YouTube. He has a straightforward presentation style and I have learned a lot from him, and his cohorts.
Second all the above, but would add an extra link.
If you want the last word, really the last word, on cholesterol, read this series in Peter Attia's blog:
http://eatingacademy.com/nutrition/the-straight-dope-on-cholesterol-part-i
Ten articles. It's hard work. But it's interesting, and really is state of the art.
The short version is, LCHF will improve most lipid indicators for most people very markedly. A few find that their LDL goes way up. For just a few of those few, that may be problematic - if the LDL particle *number* (not size) or that of an apolipoprotein called ApoB is high. But that you can only determine thro private tests.
I'm a total cholesterol-reading addict.
Good luck,
Lucy
Last time I had it checked my triglyceride level was 0.94.
My total cholesterol was 5.28, but I wouldn't want it as low as the guideline!
My LDL was 3.55.
That was a year ago. I'm getting a new test tomorrow, so that should be interesting.
I have and can get my Chol in the required ranges (Trigs <0.75, LDL< 2.3) , but I am not convinced that the targets are optimalHowever, I am always confused about this all: particles size, ratio, total cholesterol issue. From the ratio perspective my life seems to be almost perfect now at 3.7 (ideal been theoretically 3.5-1 as I understand it) but my total cholesterol is still very high at 6.1
Some are naturally high and there are some schools of thought that a higher chol figure can actually improve overall mortalty figures!
I am also confused by the NHS guidelines about LDL been 3 for healthy people and 2 for people at risk (I am at high risk and tick all the boxes), should I be worried of being at 3.02... I feel I shouldn't...
Also, has anybody here while low carbing achieved the total cholesterol at 4 and triglycerides below 1.8 that are the targets? I wonder...
But mehh, losing weight would be brilliant for your health in every possible way, so I do hope you can feel strong and supported.
You'll get those people off your back if you can manage it!
Good luck then. I was so shocked and terrified at Dx it wasn't hard for me. Harder now - I keep seeing lovely things that others are eating around me, and I can't.
Hi @mehhh2015 Have you had your thyroid checked? Low thyroid can cause high cholesterol, particularly high LDL. It also causes infertility. In Sweden they recommend a TSH below 2 when TTC.
What is your triglyceride level?Fasting has a influence, blood lipid tests are normally messured fasting, ISRT in the hours after eating Trigs go up and LDL and HDL go down by a few 1/10ths.
After going LCHF my total cholesterol went down from low 5s to below 3 with my total/HDL ratio 2.2 my Trig number is also good.
What is your triglyceride level?
Normal is far too wide, particularly if trying to conceive. The upper cut off is far lower in that case.Not recently but a few times over the last couple of years and it always came back normal. Thanks anyway
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?