Counting carbs : Nett carbs or total carbs?

sgm14 said:

I am a little confused about whether I should be counting nett or total carbs.

Click to expand...

Net carbs is an American thing as their nutrition labels are different. In the UK carbs are shown separately from fibre, so you need the total carbs and no need to deduct the fibre.

In the US, fibre is included in the carb total (although shown as a separate number) and usually it’s deducted from the total to give ‘net’ carbs.

There is a school of thought that fibre should be included when carb counting, but that’s personal choice.

Where I get my total carb content info from it does not include fibre as a extra component.

Riva_Roxaban said:

Where I get my total carb content info from it does not include fibre as a extra component.

Click to expand...

Australia count it the same as the U.K. and most of Europe on labels etc ie Carbs and fibRE separately.
It’s mostly only the USA that include fibER in their carb count.

As to why I think you’ll mostly find it’s USA based people that included fibre in their counts. And partly because of ease because of their labels. Some argue a small amount of fibre might get absorbed. Many of these are also more concerned about weight than bgl. Like mainly things in diet and definitely in keto and low carb worlds there’s no one definition of how to do it and how to count and exactly what you should do. Personal choice is a lot of it.

HSSS said:

Australia count it the same as the U.K. and most of Europe on labels etc ie Carbs and fibRE separately.
It’s mostly only the USA that include fibER in their carb count.

Click to expand...

I was chasing up some low fibre food a couple of weeks ago, it was hard to find the info on some products here.

They say lakanto sweetener is diabetic friendly as it's zero net carbs. Does anybody else use it and is it okay?

Dan O Reilly said:

They say lakanto sweetener is diabetic friendly as it's zero net carbs. Does anybody else use it and is it okay?

Click to expand...

That’s the monk fruit one isn’t it? In which case yes it’s fine. It’s plant based, like stevia. I think it has an aftertaste like stevia and is more expensive but if it works for you then great.

the things to check for sweetener is if it’s granular/tablet is the bulking agent, often dextrose or maltodextrin which still spikes bgl even though it’s calorie free. Always check with your meter your reaction to various sweeteners as mileage varies. For instance the sugar alcohol maltitol spikes a fair few people like sugar (and causes digestive upset for many). But erythritol is usually ok.

Then you have to make your personal choice about artificial like sucrolose, ace k, saccharine, aspartame verses plant based like monk fruit, stevia and the sugar alcohols (they aren’t booze btw). And decide how you feel about the taste of sweetness possibly effecting insulin even without glucose (jury is a bit undecided there), gut microbiome and the sweet taste addiction being maintained.

Rach612 said:

Would I be able to ask here when people say they have X amount carbs a day are they adding protein and fat to that as it has an affect on BGL although not as much? Apologies if not appropriate to ask on this thread.

Click to expand...

No. It’s the grams of carbs being counted.

Rach612 said:

Would I be able to ask here when people say they have X amount carbs a day are they adding protein and fat to that as it has an affect on BGL although not as much? Apologies if not appropriate to ask on this thread.

Click to expand...

No. It is a CARB count not a carb, fats and protein count (because that’s everything you eat!).

Fats do not affect bgl in any relevant way and although protein does to a slight extent for a type 2 that rarely is enough to be concerned about. (Think about the excellent control the carnivores in here have!). Lack of protein is much more likely to be a problem than too much. (Lack of energy, lack of amino acids for metabolic processes, lack of satiety causing hunger, loss of lean muscle, metabolic slow down etc)