• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Diabetes Type2 Reversed in 3 months

Great post gardel0 - I'm currently on a similar journey, but please clarify carbs/100g - do you mean 0.5g or 5g/100g? - even tinned plum tomatoes have about 3g/100g.......
Hi @XtractorFan and welcome to the forum! The general view on here seems to be that we should limit or avoid foods that have more than 5g of carbohydrates per 100g, or more than 3g of sugar per 100g.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply. I am on holiday for a couple of months in Florida and hope to surprise my doctor on my return.think I will keep taking tablets till my return. Don't have a Meyer.

If your last sentence should read "Don't have a meter." (and I'm assuming that's the case), then pop yourself into Walmart and invest in one. I have read they do a decent budget meter which would be ideal for your requirements. I'm sorry the name of it escapes me for now.

With a meter, you will be giving yourself immediate feedback n how you're doing so that you can be confident of surprising your Doctor when you get back from Florida. Without that feedback, I, personally, would worry I'd be the one getting the surprise of a less pleasant nature.

The reason I make the latter point is we all react differently to food - even some of the apparently, and usually innocuous stuff. By testing before eating, and two hours after, you will receive immediate insight into your body's reaction to what you are eating. That, and obviously what you eat and drink, are the keystones to grasping control of T2.

Good luck with it, and take advantage of the warmer climate to be out and walking perhaps a bit more than in UK. I don't necessarily mean hiking for miles, or hours on end, but parking further from the entrance to the supermarket, beach or wherever you're heading.
 
Hi @XtractorFan and welcome to the forum! The general view on here seems to be that we should limit or avoid foods that have more than 5g of carbohydrates per 100g, or 3g of sugar per 100g.

Thanks I'd kind of worked that out and still experimenting - 'netting' off the dietary fibre content is confusing, I've seen some food quote more fibre than carbs, so how does that work?
 
Hi Good on you can you let me have a list of your meal ingredients please.
 
That's great to hear you got good BGL control within 3 months... well done. Personally I've never used the word reversed as that suggests a cure when in reality it's not cured, just controlled. I managed to control my diabetes for 7 years on diet alone before I needed help. Keep up the good work.
 
Thanks I'd kind of worked that out and still experimenting - 'netting' off the dietary fibre content is confusing, I've seen some food quote more fibre than carbs, so how does that work?

It's quite simple really. I take into account Total Carbohydrate, then have a look at the "Of which are sugars" only for further information. It's Total Carb we need to be mindful of.

I look at the "Of which are sugars", because where certain sweeteners are used much of the Carb can't be digested. If I see something like 80gr Carb, if which 3gr are sugar (OK, an extreme example), I'd look at the ingredients and then look up the sweeteners for Polyols. (Wiki page for polyols here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyol)

Finally, consider how much of any given food you are going to eat. If it is a main part of your mean, as for instance, bread would be in a sandwich, then consider high carbs very carefully. If the food you are looking at is a condiment, then you cuold be having as little as a teaspoonful, so that needs to be considered when reading the "per 100gr" figures. With higher carb condiments, if you would only have a small amount, and they will make a significant difference to the enjoyment of your meal, I might have it.

It's just a case of thinking things through to a practical level.

Good luck with it all.
 
Thanks I'd kind of worked that out and still experimenting - 'netting' off the dietary fibre content is confusing, I've seen some food quote more fibre than carbs, so how does that work?
From the experience of being on many Low Carb forums, some of which are American, I believe that American food labelling is different to the system in the UK. In the UK the amount of Carbs on a label is 'Net Carbs', excluding Fibre which is listed separately. In the US, total carbs includes fibre so you have to subtract fibre to get the UK equivalent figure.
Personally I only count Net Carbs (UK style).
 
Thanks @AtkinsMo for the clarification, I should have Googled 'net carbohydrates UK' or 'nutrient information UK' earlier.
There is a lot of conflicting info out, mostly on various forums!
Even looking at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-guidance-on-nutrition-labelling didn't shed any more light on the subject, however I eventually found this on http://uk.atkins.com/community/blog/carb-counting-in-the-uk-it-differs-from-the-usa.html
Extract:
'You see, in the USA, you rely on ‘net’ carbs and this is often referred to in earlier editions of the Atkins books; which is where the confusion comes from. This is because, on labels on USA foods, fibre is included in the total ‘Carbohydrate’ count, so our American friends must deduct the fibre to get ‘net’ carbs.

However, in the UK and EU, fibre is actually shown separately so you don’t deduct it (or anything!) from the Carbohydrate total. So, for an example, if a label says:

Carbohydrates – 5g
Of which sugars – 2g
Fibre – 1g

Then you’d count a total of 5g carbohydrates for this food.

So if it's a UK/EEC labelled 'product' carbs is carbs - if it's from anywhere else anything goes.
I need to re-read my food cupboard labels again......
 
This was really interesting and useful. Thank you for taking the time to write.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…