• Guest - w'd love to know what you think about the forum! Take the 2025 Survey »

Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but....

drew900uk

Member
Messages
20
Hi All,

Firstly, may i say that this site seems truly excellent!

I was diagnosed 3 weeks ago with Type 2 at 32. Since then, i've started to play 5-a-side again and i'm eating healthily. I have 3 questions that i cannot seem to get an answer for and i'm hoping a forum member can help me out:

1. For the past 2 weeks, my fasting BG levels have been between 4.5 and 6. This seems pretty good to me but i was wandering how i compare with others out there? I dont know anyone else with diabetes (i dont think!).

2. I have starting taking a chromium supplement also, and was wondering when the best time to take it was. I have heard the mineral supplements are most effective on an empty stomach as opposed to multivits and the like which should not be taken on an empty stomach. Does anyone know when would be best?

3. I'm currently 6'2 and 100kg. This isnt a really bad BMI but can be improved. My question is that if I reach my ideal BMI, will this make my body more efficient in producing insulin.

I was a bit gutted to realise i had diabetes. Once I had time to reflect though, the recommended diet for someone with T2 diabetes is the same as anyone else. The same goes for alchohol intake. Maybe diabetes will actually have helped my health in the long run as i'll be excercing more and eating much ore healthily.

I intend to be a regular user of this forum so i look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks
Andy
Aberdeen, UK.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Hi Andy
Welcome to the Forum :wave:
The only Question I can answer is the fasting BG
Mine this morning was 8.2
Im sure others will be along to help you with your other Questions

Linda :mrgreen:
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Hi Andy

Welcome and keep asking those questions

1 - Brilliant numbers
2 - No idea, sorry
3 - Yes, losing weight and exercise helps with the insulin resistence

Watch the advice on T2 being the same as everyone else. Carbs are the problem for T2's, don't fall for the NHS eat a healthy balanced diet with starchy carbs with each meal.

Mary x
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

To confirm what maryj said, your fasting results are great. Losing weight and exercise will not improve your insulin production, but it will improve the efficiency of the insulin you DO produce by reducing your body's resistance to it. And do watch the starchy carbs! What's "healthy" for a non-diabetic isn't neccesarily healthy for us. Do you test to see how different foods affect you? That's really important.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Hi Andy

Your fasting levels are excellent what kind of levels do you get 2 hours after eating? If they go much above 7.8 then look to reduce your starchy carbs until they come into line.

I take a Chromium supplement along with a range of others. You realise there is conflicting evidence that it works at all.

Same height as you and started at a few more kilos than you but now down to 90kg with a BMI just outside "normal" and definitely seeing some improvement in insulin resistance. Still can't eat starchy carbs in any real quantity and to be honest no longer really want them too much any more.

Another test to do is take your waist measurement at its biggest point around your stomach and aim to get that under 38". That 38" measurement (for a man) is a good predictor of Type 2 diabetes. No breathing in and cheating!

The whole thing is a balance between insulin resistance and how much insulin you are still producing. If most of your problem is insulin resistance then losing weight and resistance can have really good long term effects. If your sugars ran high for too long though and you have consequently also damaged your insulin production capability then the results may be less good as you will simply be lacking insulin anyway but of course in this case losing weight and losing as much resistance as possible is even more important.

Good luck and keep asking questions.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Hi Andy and welcome to the forum This is the information that we give to new members. I hope you will it helpful and ask any more questions you need to.

 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Wow, thanks so much for all your help.

My BG is seldom above 7.8. Usually on a monday morning 2 hours after breakfast it can be a little higher as i may have a few glasses of wine of a weekend evening.

I realise that there is conflicting evidence on the affectiveness of chromium supplements. I will however continue to use them as its only 10 quid for 365 at healthspan.

I am also trying to get most of my carbs from veg. Not sure what the best candidates are. I love to cook and have been cooking very tasty daals especially.

I dont particularly check my levels after what i eat. Not yet anyway. I'll get there though. At the moment i'm just concentrating on losing weight and making sure my BG is whithin the normal range and so far, most readings bar less than 5 have been less than 7.8.

Thanks all for your responses. I look forward to having a good look around the site. At the moment my parents are staying with me so i'll be laying low for a little while.
Thanks!!
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

I've been taking chromium since I was diagnosed 20mths ago tpe 2. I take 200mg per day in the morning with my breakfast, my levels have stabilised at 5.3. don't know whether it's my diet alone (I'm following the gi diet) or whether the chromium has helped.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Thanks. When you say that your levels have stabilised at 5.3, I presume you mean pre food?

My levels have been 'truly excellent' to quote the doctor. I would live to hav a stable level though as after food I am still spiking, albeit usually under 8 or 8.5
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Another thing actually is that my BG seems higher after 1 hour or so as opposed to 2 hours. I presume that I should now look to test after 1 hour instead? I mean, the blood sugar spike is what we want to gauge after all.

Thanks
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

The reason for testing after 2 hours is that your reading should be approximately the same as before eating. That way you can tell if what you ate was right for you. If the 2 hour reading is higher than before eating, you need to reduce or cut out that food, having identified which of the foods is concerned.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

Daisy, thanks. Information I have taken from this site suggests that between 4-7 pre meal, then under 8.5 2 hours after is acceptable for type 2 diabetics. that's what I've been measuring it on. Is that wrong?
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

drew900uk said:
3. I'm currently 6'2 and 100kg. This isnt a really bad BMI but can be improved. My question is that if I reach my ideal BMI, will this make my body more efficient in producing insulin.

Hi Andy,

I'm also 32 and was diagnosed quite recently, too. Like you, I don't need tablets and was told to control things through diet. My levels from my initial blood test put me at the bottom of being diabetic, so close in fact that my GP has told me if I lose 2 stone he thinks I will have my levels back below pre-diabetic levels, so if you get down to your "ideal BMI", the same thing might happen for you.
 
Re: Diagnosed 3 weeks ago with type 2. No meds needed but..

drew900uk said:
Daisy, thanks. Information I have taken from this site suggests that between 4-7 pre meal, then under 8.5 2 hours after is acceptable for type 2 diabetics. that's what I've been measuring it on. Is that wrong?

No, that's right. They are the NICE guidelines. However, some of us use that as a starting point, then set lower targets for 2 hours aftyer eating. Lower than 7.8 is a common one, as that is the maximum an average non-diabetic could get too at any stage after eating. Some of us try to get below 7. This ties in with what Daisy said - the nearer you can get to the +2 hour reading being the same as the before eating reading, the better. Most of us don't get the readings the same. I'm happy if it's less than 7, but it took a while to get there. As a newly-diagnosed, just aim at avoiding the big peaks and gradually set your sights for lower targets. All these readings are at +2 hours - you're right in that we peak earlier with a lot of foods (food type controls when, often about 1 hour after is the peak) but we're not trying to measure that.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn More.…