I find it interesting what they were doing. Modern science has failed us in trying to figure out what is a healthy diet. Or at least the official government dietary guidelines have.I don't really care what our ancestors were or weren't doing. They were trying to survive day to day we are trying to live long happy lives and we have modern science to help up determine what nutrition is best for us now.
But fat intake in people's diet has been growing every year for the past 50yrs so regardless of these guidelines our fat intake has continued to rise.That's easy: increased processed food/sugar in the diet, the official dietary guidelines of high carb/low fat, and an increasingly sedentary lifestyle.
I agree with you that the current government dietary guidelines don't go far enough. They recommend 70g fat for example for an average women or 32% calories from fat, far far too high.I find it interesting what they were doing. Modern science has failed us in trying to figure out what is a healthy diet. Or at least the official government dietary guidelines have.
Oh and modern nutritional science is not confused about what is a healthy diet at all. Reductionist science has tried to boil it down to individual nutrients etc. but the consensus is definitely the more fruits and vegetables the better.I find it interesting what they were doing. Modern science has failed us in trying to figure out what is a healthy diet. Or at least the official government dietary guidelines have.
They are peer reviewed double blind placebo controlled studies. Are your studies scientifically rigourous?Yes, they are crammed full of cherry-picked references. I happen to know that there are plenty of studies that have different results than the ones he uses.
I find it interesting what they were doing. Modern science has failed us in trying to figure out what is a healthy diet. Or at least the official government dietary guidelines have.
Please find for us a single diet study (i.e. not medication) that is a "double blind placebo controlled study".They are peer reviewed double blind placebo controlled studies. Are your studies scientifically rigourous?
But we haven;t "cut back on fat" as the article attests! This is one paper by what i bet you will find are funded by the animal industry.
And AliensBut we haven;t "cut back on fat" as the article attests! This is one paper by what i bet you will find are funded by the animal industry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?