Testing should be done just before the first bite of a meal (pre prandial) then two hours after you had your first bite (post prandial). The difference in readings will show you whether or not something you had in that particular meal raised your blood glucose by more than 2mmol, if it did then you look at what you had and, let's say you had a pork chop with broccoli, cauliflower and carrots and your reading showed a greater than 2mmol difference, you then at a later date, have the same meal but you cut out one of the vegetables and compare readings. You are recording your meals and readings to compare so there is no real need to test individual foodstuffs. Things like tea and coffee etc can be counted as part of a meal but unless you are still sugaring your hot drinks a quick carb count will let you know how it is likely to affect your bg.
Hope this helps.
While we all react differently there are whole groups of food that are accepted to be high carb and raise BG or low carb and don't. So initially avoid the former, potatoes, bread, rice, pasta etc. and include the latter, meat, fish, cauliflower, cabbage etc. This leaves the types of food you need to test. So have a meal with say a pork chop, cauliflower and lentils and see what increase in BG you get after 2 hours. If it is way to high, lentils are not for you, if it is a bit high then reduce the portion of lentils next time. Or have egg, bacon, and a slice of Burgen toast for breakfast, if that's ok then next time add a small quantity of baked beans and so on. After a while you will have an idea what you can and can't eat and you can start fine tuning the types of foods and the amounts. Keep a diary of what you ate and the readings and a pattern will emerge.For bg testing a particular meal e.g. cauliflower cheese, I always also drink tea? How can you test one food on its own?. This does not reflect a true meal. I am starting to wonder who does regular single food testing? It's bizarre.
I was diagnosed just six months ago @bangkokdiabetic. Without testing I would be flying blind. How else can we see how our individual reactions to different foods affect blood glucose levels? A glucometer is, in my opinion, the best piece of kit at my disposal.
Welcome to the forum, btw.
Thanks for that very helpful to a confused newbieTesting should be done just before the first bite of a meal (pre prandial) then two hours after you had your first bite (post prandial). The difference in readings will show you whether or not something you had in that particular meal raised your blood glucose by more than 2mmol, if it did then you look at what you had and, let's say you had a pork chop with broccoli, cauliflower and carrots and your reading showed a greater than 2mmol difference, you then at a later date, have the same meal but you cut out one of the vegetables and compare readings. You are recording your meals and readings to compare so there is no real need to test individual foodstuffs. Things like tea and coffee etc can be counted as part of a meal but unless you are still sugaring your hot drinks a quick carb count will let you know how it is likely to affect your bg.
Hope this helps.
So I test just before a meal - but have to take metaformin with the meal - so that will have an effect on the next test result
Thanks for clarifying that - this is a steep learning curve at the moment !No, it won't have any effect at all. Metformin doesn't work like that. Some of the stronger drugs would, but not Metformin. It will not alter what happens to your levels after eating, not one little bit. Please don't worry about this. Metformin works on the liver to help reduce the amount of glucose the liver secretes from its stores, it helps a little with insulin resistance, and it is an appetite suppressant.
I sometimes see posts from diet controlled Type 2's that give the impression that testing affects your blood glucose - it doesn't. What makes a difference is what you do as a result of the tests. The useful thing about the post-prandial test is that it gives you a guide to what food and in what quantities, you can eat and what you can't. The testing is not a precise laboratory experiment, there are all sorts of variables, not least the accuracy of meters, so doing a bit of tasting is not going to affect the result significantly. Measuring 2 hours after starting a meal or finishing it doesn't make much difference if you a a fast eater like me, just do the same thing each time for consistency. If you are eating a long drawn out meal, then that is not the time to be testing the effect of certain foods. Similarly if you have been fasting for 24 hours, who knows how that is going to affect your testing of a meal. As I say, the actual testing achieves nothing, leave the testing to more typical circumstances when you can use the result.Resurrection of an old thread (sorry) but it is relevant to my question which is regarding “first bite”.
When I cook, I taste for seasoning etc. What if I prepare a meal, taste or nibble a bit as I go along, then pop said meal in the oven for an hour before I actually eat a portion of it?
What counts as “first bite”?
Similarly, if I know the meal is going to take an hour to cook, but I have been fasting for 24 hours, just got home from work after being stuck in traffic, and absolutely have to have something to eat (eg. a piece of cheese or slice of ham), how does the post prandial test time work in that case?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?