I expect that avoiding peaks (and fast charges) is of more value for long term health then getting a A1c a little lower, hence how important is accuracy?
I've had as much of a problem with the Libre's precision as I have with BG meters; they're wrong sometimes and always will be. Although I've never had a full day of incorrect results like what @Mel dCP posted.
I was considering getting a MiaoMiao, for the simple reason that I'd like alerts if going high or low and the Libre 2 would give me this functionality. I'll probably still get a MM as I'll still have to fork out for a new reader for the Libre 2. Plus, looking at Twitter, Abbott are being very non-committal about when they're going to release this outside of Germany - could be ages away.
This is true of all CGM. Have you tried others to see whether you are compatible. Some people simply aren't.If we are to trust Mr. Google, it seems that some people get good (accurate) readings with the Libre, and some doesn't. I unfortunately belong to the group, that very, very often get wrong results - and yes, I don't mean it occasionally give false readings. A for me not compatible(?) sensor, gives faulty readings more or less all the time. I don't mind if the margin of errors goes up to say 1.5 mmol/l, but more than that means - you get a reading of for example 7.5, what the BG-meter shows is then usually around 9.5 or more, for me - not good... I believe in my BS-meter, it corresponds to how I feel.
This is true of all CGM. Have you tried others to see whether you are compatible. Some people simply aren't.
I guess you're right then, some people have accurate results, some don't. Guess it's because it's not directly measuring blood glucoseIf we are to trust Mr. Google, it seems that some people get good (accurate) readings with the Libre, and some doesn't. I unfortunately belong to the group, that very, very often get wrong results - and yes, I don't mean it occasionally give false readings. A for me not compatible(?) sensor, gives faulty readings more or less all the time. I don't mind if the margin of errors goes up to say 1.5 mmol/l, but more than that means - you get a reading of for example 7.5, what the BG-meter shows is then usually around 9.5 or more, for me - not good... I believe in my BS-meter, it corresponds to how I feel.
I use Spike, which is the iPhone collector app for MiaoMiao. It’ll alarm if you are rising or falling quickly, as well as if you hit your upper and lower target numbers. You can set it to alarm at whatever rate of change you like. Mine is set at a change rate of 0.6mmol/5mins and it shouts “glucose is rising/falling fast” at me. All the thresholds are set by the user.Do we know if it's going to alert if you are going to be out of range, or if you are already out of range?
With MiaoMiao and the phone apps, what do they do?
I wonder if the range is factory set, or user set?
Everybody is speculating about power and frequency of comms. Abbott have clearly stated that there will be comms every minute from the sensor to the reader. So we might as well stop it with the well how's it going to have the power conversation. They've clearly stated that it does. They just been cagey about its content.Two way communication is not hard to do over their system and is already done to activate a sensor. Hence I am thinking the sensor may just transmit a hartbeat say every 15 minutes along with having very limit trigger surport, with a single value raw data pocket sent when a trigger fires. (or just send a packet when the BG value has changed a lot)
And in Gitter. And as you might expect, nobody knows as Abbott have not confirmed anything. We'll have to wait until it become available or there is a leak.It's being discussed on jamorham's gitter page (he's the lead developer on xdrip+), so it will be interesting to see their take on it as time goes by.
https://gitter.im/jamorham/xDrip-plus
With MiaoMiao and the phone apps, what do they do?
Also I think Abbott have been very clever here, There aren't that many T1Ds that get a full blown CGM on the NHS for the reason of not having any hypo awareness, and there are plenty out that that do suffer from not having hypo awareness - having hi-lo alarms fits nicely into this scenario and at a cost already agreed by the NHS - this is a win win for Abbott, the NHS AND those with no hypo awareness surely?
Wow, thanks for such a comprehensive reply - it looks fantastic! I'll deffo be buying an MM next pay dayMeant to reply to this earlier but forgot. As well as the highly customisable alerts, the android app xDrip+ has a quite sophisticated "predictive simulation" function, which I've found very useful, although, like any prediction, it needs to be used for a while to get used to it's quirks.
What happens is that you input your own parameters for insulin/carb ratios etc as per pic below, customisable for certain times of day.
Once that's done, each time you enter a bolus or carb amount, as well as showing insulin on board, which is very useful on it's own, it'll also extend the live cgm trace into a prediction of where that shot/carbs might take you, see pic below, the purple dots extending out from the blue live dots is the prediction.
The red dots extend out when it identifies a trend, and if it intersects with your low level, it'll say low predicted in x minutes, so gives you a heads up to keep an eye on it.
Like I say, it takes a bit of getting used to, it can be a bit squirrely at times, it'll sometimes radically rethink the prediction as additional 5 min readings come in, but all in all, I've gotten a lot of useful information out of it which I've used to make bolusing or dextro decisions to tweak things when it looks like it might start trending out of range. It's like a bolus wizard on steroids.
A few months back, a libre sensor totally died on me, so I was blind for about 8 hrs till I got home and got a new on. I carried on entering bolus and carb amounts during the dead time, because I still wanted to keep an eye on iob. The app continued to do the predictions. I was testing a lot more and the simulation was surprisingly accurate - wouldn't go as far as saying it was cgm without a sensor but it was close.
View attachment 28844
View attachment 28845
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?