Hi
@Speedbird
Hugs for the HbA1c that is higher than expected. I'm also one of those that tend to score higher on the HbA1c than on finger prick test. The main reason that this might happen is that for an HbA1c the expected mean survival time for red blood cells is approximately 120 days
https://www.mlo-online.com/disease/diabetes/article/21085264/the-impact-of-red-blood-cell-lifespan-on-hba1c-measurement#:~:text=Assumptions related to RBC survival The HbA1c results,have an average circulating lifespan of 120 days. However, in many of us with good glucose management, red blood cell survival time is longer than average, thus allowing these cells to glycate for longer, while with very high blood sugars, red blood cells die earlier, thus lowering average red blood cells survival and thus leading to HbA1cs, which are unrealistically low.
Interestingly, my HbA1c has dropped since my GP has started testing HbA1c in his practice (because he has bought the necessary equipment) instead of sending it out to a lab.
So, to answer your question -- I personally put more faith in my blood sugar meter (compared to a lab test). However, I also sometimes take tests half an hour, one hour, and one and a half hours after eating as well as directly after exercising to try to catch all peaks. I also tested my meter against lab test (e.g. fasting value) to ascertain it is reasonably accurate.