Thanks for your reply. It's so annoying though eh. I regularly get fasting levels of around 6.0 these days which I really don't like but now I'm like are they accurate or what?Mine doesnt match either. My FBG according to my meter which I did as the lab drew the blood was a full point lower than the lab. So when I was seeing a 4.9 on my meter it was actually 5.9. My A1c is higher than I expected. Meters can be out by up to 20%
It's "or what?" I'm afraid.Thanks for your reply. It's so annoying though eh. I regularly get fasting levels of around 6.0 these days which I really don't like but now I'm like are they accurate or what?
It's "or what?" I'm afraid.
Are the lab results accurate though?The numbers you obtain from a meter will generally be different to those obtained in the lab, and also to those obtained from other meters. The higher your number is, the higher the degree of inaccuracy.
They have to meet specifications that are far tighter than a home meter and they are the only results acceptable for diagnosis and/or treatment.Are the lab results accurate though?
What you mean to say is your *glucometer does not match your HbA1c.
Meters can give estimates and that's great because it can give you a rough idea of how your doing over all. Rough being the operative word here.
Glucose meters will only give you an A1c estimation with respect to the measurements you've taken. The lab test (to put it simply) works out the differences in glucose content of blood that is stuck to the A1c proteins in your body. This is how they can calculate an average value over the course of 2-3 months, because that's how long these proteins are around.
I'd say that's more accurate than your meter.
Sorry I am confused. does the whole blood measure from my meter more accurately reflect how much glucose is in my blood than the plasma measure from the lab? so the plasma reading of 5.0 suggests there is not much glucose in my blood but because the meter checks whole blood a reading of 6.0 from my meter means there is more glucose in my blood. Sorry I don't know if that makes sense
Grant
What you mean to say is your *glucometer does not match your HbA1c.
Meters can give estimates and that's great because it can give you a rough idea of how your doing over all. Rough being the operative word here.
Glucose meters will only give you an A1c estimation with respect to the measurements you've taken. The lab test (to put it simply) works out the differences in glucose content of blood that is stuck to the A1c proteins in your body. This is how they can calculate an average value over the course of 2-3 months, because that's how long these proteins are around.
I'd say that's more accurate than your meter.
Grant
What you mean to say is your *glucometer does not match your HbA1c.
Meters can give estimates and that's great because it can give you a rough idea of how your doing over all. Rough being the operative word here.
Glucose meters will only give you an A1c estimation with respect to the measurements you've taken. The lab test (to put it simply) works out the differences in glucose content of blood that is stuck to the A1c proteins in your body. This is how they can calculate an average value over the course of 2-3 months, because that's how long these proteins are around.
I'd say that's more accurate than your meter.
Grant
Your average readings on your meter are not reliable enough to estimate an HbA1c unless you do finger prick tests every half an hour 24/7. You have no idea what is going on in between your tests.
As you say you have iron deficiency anaemia and other conditions these will no doubt have skewed your HbA1c. It is well known and proved that anaemic issues give false HbA1c results.
It is also important to remember that lab tests are done from venous blood and it is the plasma that is checked. Finger prick tests are capillary blood and it is whole blood, not plasma. Whole blood contains more glucose than plasma blood. Unless your particular meter has an inbuilt calibration to convert the whole blood reading to a plasma reading, there will, on average, be a 12% difference. The meter will read higher than the lab test by around 12%. If your meter is a Codefree or an Accu Chek Mobile, these meters are calibrated so no need to deduct/add 12%. I have no idea if others are.
I wouldn't be concerned or get tied up in the differences between plasma blood glucose and whole blood glucose.Sorry I am confused. do whole blood samples from meters more accurately reflect how much glucose is in your blood because it measures your whole blood instead of just part of your blood as measured by the plasma samples in the lab? so if you had a meter that measured plasma blood glucose would that not tell you how much glucose is really in your blood because it would be lower than whole blood measures?
Many if not most glucometers in America are calibrated to plasma. In Britain, all but 2 glucometers are calibrated to whole blood (said a post in these forums this month).
thanks for your comment. I tested on my meter five minutes before blood draw at lab and after, both readings were 6.0. my meter apparently measures whole blood.The original poster's question is intriguing. But it didn't say when was the most recent home fingerstick before the lab fasting glucose measurement.
To ensure accurate measurement, first rinse the skin well. Just by touching a banana skin, for example, you could pick up enough sugar to spoil the measurement.
Many if not most glucometers in America are calibrated to plasma. In Britain, all but 2 glucometers are calibrated to whole blood (said a post in these forums this month).
The "true" clinical measurement of glucose levels is calibrated to plasma -- the lab test of fasting glucose, is a fasting plasma glucose test, FPG. The conversion between whole blood calibration and plasma calibration depends on the value of the 'hematocrit (haematocrit)' (the proportion of red cells in the blood), which is one of the measures of the blood's content of red cells and haemoglobin. I suppose a person with iron deficiency anaemia also has an abnormal haematocrit, and this could throw off the glucometer reading.
The A1c is systematically inaccurate when there are interferences. Some interferences cause a false high, others a false low. Iron deficiency anaemia will cause a falsely high A1c (cause an elevation). This was reported at least as early as 2007. A 2014 Iranian study confirmed it (and found also that the effect is even greater at fasting glucose levels in the American defined prediabetic range of 5.5 - 6.9). A 2015 article reports a rare population based study: Implications of iron deficiency/anemia on the classification of diabetes using HbA1c. Nutrition & diabetes 5. One of the findings was that "Fewer participants with ID alone versus normal iron/hemoglobin were classified with diabetes using HbA1c only." This reflects that I.D. elevates the A1c result.
The whole blood figure is lower than the plasma because the glucose is in solution in the plasma, and the removal of the blood cells reduces the sample volume, thereby concentrating whatever is left.
As you say you have iron deficiency anaemia and other conditions these will no doubt have skewed your HbA1c. It is well known and proved that anaemic issues give false HbA1c results..
thanks for your comment. I tested on my meter five minutes before blood draw at lab and after, both readings were 6.0. my meter apparently measures whole blood.
I have read studies which have opposing views regarding the impact that Id has on hba1c with some suggesting it lowers it and some suggesting it makes it higher. I had my haemoglobin measured too and that came back normal but my mcv came back just above the threshold for normal.
I'm still confused
A couple of days ago I had an hba1c and fasting bsl done at the lab.
My hba1c came back at 30 or 4.9 and fasting blood sugar level came back 5.0.
I checked my fasting level before I went into the lab and according to my meter it was 6.0 which it is pretty regularly.
from my meter readings I expected my hba1c to be around 36 or about 5.5.
I have iron deficiency which my help explain hba1c but fasting level? I don't get how that could be so different to my meter.
It would be easy to slime my meter was reading higher than it should be today my fasting level was 3.8 so I don't think it could have been lower than that.
Does anyone have any idea about what might be going on?
I had an albumin test do e too which was normal which suggests that I do t have kidney or liver disease which can skew hba1c results.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?