wigzaah said:i'm a (relatively May 2010) newly diagnosed diabetic. i had ignored the symptoms for a while but got fed up with drinking litres and litres of water a day and the associated 1/4 hourly trips to the toilet.
initially i was told it was type 1 as my keytones (?) were off the scale. i was put straight onto insulin - noverapid and insulatard. my 1st hba1c was 7.1 - the consultant wrote 'satisfactory' on the letter. my next hba1c was 5.7 - tremendous i thought, that will please her! au contraire, the consultant said it was the sort of level you would expect of a non-diabetic and too low! i thought the point of the insulin, diet control and extra exercise was to make me more like a non-diabetic.
then she told me that she now thinks it is T2 but had been undiagnosed for a long time. i was given the option of switching from injections (which i hate) to tablets but on the basis she said i would almost inevitably end up back on the injections i decided to stick with them.
whilst i appreciate there's a difference between 5.7 and 7.1, my understanding of 'satisfactory' is "kind of OK, could do better" but when i did better (so i thought) i was told it was effectively too good.
any views on what i should be aiming for?
confused of bristol!
by the way, i've really enjoyed reading some of the threads on this site. reading about other peoples' experiences has really helped with some aspects.
wigzaah
wigzaah said:thanks ebony, it's useful to read about personal experiences rather than just theory. my outlook on may things is "if it ain't broke don't fix it", i've got good control of my levels so i think i'll stick with pin cushion!
thanks again for your reply
Wig
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?