Hi. I am 65 (how did that happen?) and no mention of triglycerides.It would be indelicate of me to ask your age, but higher cholesterol is better for women aged 60 or over. Unfortunately, don't ever expect to find a GP who knows that.
Here's some possible readig for you :
https://www.google.co.uk/search?num...1j0i131k1j0i10k1j0i46k1j0i22i30k1.bK2VM-BB3sY
I would ask one thing (two really). Were your triglycerides tested, and was the test a fastingone ?
Geoff
Triglycerides are usually tested as part of a full lipid panel test. They can be useful to determine whether your LDL is largely harmless or largely harmful. A fasting test is essential for an accurate trigs result. Perhaps next 'bloods' test try to get an early appointment, so any morning food can be taken afterwards.Hi. I am 65 (how did that happen?) and no mention of triglycerides.
X hTriglycerides are usually tested as part of a full lipid panel test. They can be useful to determine whether your LDL is largely harmless or largely harmful. A fasting test is essential for an accurate trigs result. Perhaps next 'bloods' test try to get an early appointment, so any morning food can be taken afterwards.
If your GP is online, register for online access. You can peruse any non-headline results you weren't given.
Is your GP pushing for statins ? Dr Malcolm Kendrick has this to say :
"Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Is it possible to highlight how important this fact actually is ?.
STATINS DO NOT SAVE LIVES IN WOMEN !"
(From his great The Great Cholesterol Con)
Geoff (born in 1952)
No, to be fair she hasn't mentioned medication. I won't take statins anyway. I have been given a booklet on reducing cholesterol and I'm confident that I can do that by reducing fats.Triglycerides are usually tested as part of a full lipid panel test. They can be useful to determine whether your LDL is largely harmless or largely harmful. A fasting test is essential for an accurate trigs result. Perhaps next 'bloods' test try to get an early appointment, so any morning food can be taken afterwards.
If your GP is online, register for online access. You can peruse any non-headline results you weren't given.
Is your GP pushing for statins ? Dr Malcolm Kendrick has this to say :
"Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Is it possible to highlight how important this fact actually is ?.
STATINS DO NOT SAVE LIVES IN WOMEN !"
(From his great The Great Cholesterol Con)
Geoff (born in 1952)
Triglycerides are usually tested as part of a full lipid panel test. They can be useful to determine whether your LDL is largely harmless or largely harmful. A fasting test is essential for an accurate trigs result. Perhaps next 'bloods' test try to get an early appointment, so any morning food can be taken afterwards.
If your GP is online, register for online access. You can peruse any non-headline results you weren't given.
Is your GP pushing for statins ? Dr Malcolm Kendrick has this to say :
"Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Statins do not save lives in women.
Is it possible to highlight how important this fact actually is ?.
STATINS DO NOT SAVE LIVES IN WOMEN !"
(From his great The Great Cholesterol Con)
Geoff (born in 1952)
Have just received latest HbA1c result and am pleased with a 38 mmol/mol reading.
Can someone in the know please put me in the picture regarding my cholesterol result which is raised from last September?
Serum cholesterol 7 mmol/L
Serum HDL. 1.6
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio. 4.4
Non HDL cholesterol 5.4
After eating, your triglycerides will increase temporarily. Only after fasting will you find out your 'base' rate.I had a non fasting test that gave me triglycerides, is that not an accurate level?
Would a very low fasting triglycerides reading (<0.5) along with a "high" LDL reading (>4.0) be of any concern?
I would only want to know what your HDL figure, in conjunction with your trigs figure, was.Would a very low fasting triglycerides reading (<0.5) along with a "high" LDL reading (>4.0) be of any concern?
I would only want to know what your HDL figure, in conjunction with your trigs figure, was.
This ratio will give you a very good indication of how 'friendly' your LDL is e.g. trigs 0.5 HDL 1.0 = ratio of 0.5 indicating very friendly LDL.
Stop thinking of LDL cholesterol as 'bad'. High trigs are bad, and indicative of unfriendly LDL. High LDL with low trigs = most probably friendly.
Geoff
If you read the first part of my reply, you'll understand the second.That would be less worrying without the 'probably'.
That's why I like to keep my cholesterol under control.
I think it needs to be fasting otherwise it's affected by what you eat.I had a non fasting test that gave me triglycerides, is that not an accurate level?
If you read the first part of my reply, you'll understand the second.
Call me lazy ; )
Geoff
"High LDL with low trigs = most probably friendly."Call it hedging your bets.
If it was laziness, you'd leave words out, not put more in.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?