I sympathise with your story. I keep getting T1;s telling me I need to go for insulin, and the C-peptide etc since I had high bgl readings in the high 20 mmol/l, and an HBA1c of 99. My GP did refer me to the consultant for insulin training, but I managed to drop my bgl by eating to my meter. Then I went LC diet, and my levels came down to almost normal (HbA1c of 43). I have also done this while more than halving my diabetes meds. It is nice to see both post prandial tests coming in lower than the pre meal reading after eating a large satisfying meal.Thank you for your long note. The Dr was initially concerned I was T1 but did a C-peptide test and confirmed this was negative for T1.
I was put on Metformin and together with diet my A1C was down to 59 is 2 months so this (together with the C-peptide) convinced the Dr I was t2.
My dietician was adamant that I was T1 and wants me to have second opinion so I have seeing a consultant for a GAD test but my initial consultation confirmed that I am T2 despite very odd initial diagnosis.
After 10 years since DX, without insulin, then Yes I am sure. My daily bgl is currently running at 7.2 mmol/l and I rarely go above 9. My T1D buddy (on an insulin pump) varies between 2 and 25 mmol/l and is considered to be In Control At least twice a month I have to call the paramedics to pick him up off the floor. I am glad I am a T2D.Oldvatr - thank you for your post.
So are you definitely a T2 as well?
I have convinced myself I must be if I have gotten my BS down so much without injecting insulin. That must surely be impossible if you were T1?
I would not vote for her, but I agree with your comment here.Yes, I am not sure I could cope at all with the demands and volatility of life as a T1.
Although Theresa May has shown herself to be a second rate politician, I take my hat off to her for being able to sustain that job for any period of time under the cloud of T1 life.
These guys are still trying to find the gene that is responsible for shyness. They are sure its there, but it is hiding behind the others.To be fair, most of the offspring of a parent with type 2 diabetes do NOT develop diabetes. The risk is 1 in 7 if the parent was under 50 when diagnosed or 1 in 13 if the parent was over 50 (assuming the other parent does not also have type 2 diabetes).
https://www.diabetesselfmanagement....reducing-diabetes-risks-for-the-whole-family/
The Joslin Diabetes Centre says, "The genetics of type 2 diabetes is complex. While type 2 diabetes may have a strong genetic basis in some patients (something less than a third of them), the development of diabetes in most patients is dependent upon the effects of environmental and behavioral factors (obesity and sedentary lifestyle) on an underlying susceptibility that is poorly understood."
http://www.joslin.org/info/genetics_and_diabetes.html
Yes.... far too harsh..Or am I being too harsh?
I agree.Dont be too hard on your Mum.Information was not so easily obtained when I was diagnosed in 2001.The fear overshadowing our family was the risk of stroke,several members had already suffered and needed care.My reaction was,head down,take the tablets and continue to eat a healthy diet with exercise.I was only a little overweight and no couch potato.Some older people just don't do research as you have so obviously done. You have to remember that they are a different generation and probably not used to tech as you are. They also think that it only something to do with them and their doctor and no one else's business. Try not to be on hard on your mum, it's not totally her fault.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?