Lots of us have different hypo experiences.
People on meds like insulin or gliclazide can have hypos because the meds
may in certain circumstances overwhelm the body's ability to remove stored glycogen(glucose) from the liver and release it into the bloodstream.
Type 2s not on such strong meds seem to rarely hypo (going by comments on this forum), because if their blood glucose dips a bit, their liver just releases glycogen to make up the deficit. Many T2s never hypo.
However, in a few circumstances, such as illness, reactive hypoglycaemia, recreational drugs, stress, etc. hypos
are possible. In fact they are possible for anyone, whether they are diabetic or not... but it usually takes a specific event or trigger.
My experience, as a low carber and a T2 reactive hypoglycaemic is that low carbing makes my hypos much more unlikely, and when/if they happen they are much milder, easier, and less miserable than they used to be when carbing.
I am wondering if your doc's comment stems from a common misunderstanding amongst medical professionals - that a low HbA1c means that you must be hypoing regularly.
Since the HbA1c is an 'average' figure over the last few months, you can get a low average by maintaining lovely steady numbers using low carb, or by a series of high-low zig zags. I think the misunderstanding comes from a study where people on meds, with lower HbA1cs also had a higher number of hypos. But of course, the key element there is the fact that they were on meds and were not low carbing... sorry, I have lost the reference to the study.
Anyway, it seems to have been widely (and weirdly) accepted as a 'fact' by medical professionals that a diabetic with non-diabetic blood glucose levels
must be hypo a lot. But then, you have just proved
that idea wrong, haven't you?