kitedoc
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,785
- Location
- Adelaide, South Australia
- Type of diabetes
- Type 1
- Treatment type
- Pump
- Dislikes
- black jelly beans
I note the How To Treat A Hypo information. As a T1D for 58 years I have a 'passing familiarity' with hypos. What concerns me is that:
a) whilst glucose is listed as the first option for treatment, the next options are 'fizzy drinks, sweets and fruit juice'.
From past clinical experience and my diabetes education, these later options contain sucrose,(table sugar) which the saliva in our mouth
usually breaks down to glucose and fructose (fruit sugar). The glucose is needed to raise our BGLs but the fructose does not of itself raise
blood glucose levels. Fruit juices also contain levels of fructose and over many years the cultivation of fruit has led to higher levels in fruit.
What is worse, such rapidly absorbed fructose is coped with by liver the same way alcohol is - by being turned into fat, and stored in the liver.
Fructose is sometimes referred to as children's alcohol, you get the liver problems like fatty liver , just not with alcohol itself.
You might ask, but what does it matter having sucrose as a hypo remedy on one occasion?
But, how many hypos can happen in a day, a week or a month? - with T1D as a child like I was - how many typos and treatments over years?
Fortunately for me now on a very low carb diet, hypos are rare and mild, and I have routinely used glucose for hypos except on the very rare
occasion where I have run out, it got wet and dissolved etc. Then any glucose such as in the other portions mentioned above is a last resort.
But, as Dr Bernstein states (paraphrased), 'the most usual cause of hypoglycaemia is from high carb diets requiring industrial doses of insulin'
b) If I suffer a rebound high BGL from treating a hypo, or a high BGL for any reason above 7 mmol/l, this leads to a biochemical sequence called the
POYOL pathway - whereby 30% of that BGL is converted to fructose whereas under 7 mmol/l the amount of BGL converted to fructose is only 3 to 5%.
What can fructose from a) or b) do beyond the developing of fatty liver - the other complications associated with repeated exposure to fructose
include damage to the back of the eyer (retina), cataracts in the lenses of the eye, damage to kidneys and nerves.
If you think that a BGL of 7 mmol/l just comes and goes, there is a equivalence chart of average BGL vs HBA1c - two derivations 1) from the Diabetes
Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and another made up by a committee of the ADA and commercial interest titled the ADAG. see diagram.
An average BGL of 7 mmol/l = 5.7% (DCCT) or about 6% (ADAG). Please think about that the next time you see the official recommnedatons for HBA1c !!
/Users/tonysangster/Desktop/IMG_2500.jpeg
I’m somewhat confused too…Might be missing the point here - Glucose fastest through the intestine into the blood stream as no digestion (fastest fix), but used quickly in the body so following crash if no-backup slow digesting carbs can happen.
In a perfect world - no or few low BG events that need treatment - in reality are people consuming enough fruit or sugary drinks to cause that big an issue (compared with the other issues of diet and diabetes, like overeating, hyper glycemia etc)?
Most of us find our own way through it, and find a practical solution (I tend to have a 500ml bottle of Lucozade sport on the side in the kitchen (till I either drink it, or penicillin grows on the surface) - Fruit juice wouldn't last long enough....
Am i right in thinking if you consume too much fructose there is a potential of organ damage?
As you say @SimonP78 "non-optimal" applies to chocolate and any milk that isn't skimmed. I remember doing exactly this! But for other readers it's worth pointing out that chocolate, to say the least, is fatty and slows down absorption considerably. A chocolate bar will work eventually, but the delay can cause even more wolfing down of sweet food in order to regain a higher blood glucose level.these things are almost always non-optimal from an absorption point of view and certainly from an "empty calories" point of view. But they taste nice- chocolate, cake, vanilla milk, etc.
On the other hand, while glucotabs and the likes will work faster, I also hate them with a vengeance and lows make me pretty stubborn and not wanting to eat, even if I know I must. So chocolate works better for me because I'd at least eat it.As you say @SimonP78 "non-optimal" applies to chocolate and any milk that isn't skimmed. I remember doing exactly this! But for other readers it's worth pointing out that chocolate, to say the least, is fatty and slows down absorption considerably. A chocolate bar will work eventually, but the delay can cause even more wolfing down of sweet food in order to regain a higher blood glucose level.
Agreed @Antje77 I am only trying to point out that fat candelay absorption - something which took me years to realise. Enjoy the chocolate!On the other hand, while glucotabs and the likes will work faster, I also hate them with a vengeance and lows make me pretty stubborn and not wanting to eat, even if I know I must. So chocolate works better for me because I'd at least eat it.
I absolutely love treating hypos with a bit of fruit when I get the chance, and I'm not worried that the occasional half mandarin orange or a couple of grapes will give me fatty liver disease.
Chocolate hardly ever happens for a hypo, sadly. Toxic to dogs so I don't carry any, and my 90% cocoa chocolate is safely in a closed box because dogs, and it wouldn't do anything for a hypo anyway.Agreed @Antje77 I am only trying to point out that fat candelay absorption - something which took me years to realise. Enjoy the chocolate!
In my bag I tend to alternate winegum type treats and liquorice (but definitely not allsorts, which is called 'Engelse drop' in Dutch).Our local shop sells packets of liquorice allsorts and each sweet is approx 5g carb. Hypo treatment treat. No, no deliberate hypos to get a fix and I bet your liquorice is better, Antje.
Chocolate hardly ever happens for a hypo, sadly. Toxic to dogs so I don't carry any, and my 90% cocoa chocolate is safely in a closed box because dogs, and it wouldn't do anything for a hypo anyway.
In my bag I tend to alternate winegum type treats and liquorice (but definitely not allsorts, which is called 'Engelse drop' in Dutch).
Yes, our liquorice is better, especially the salty stuff, but I've learnt not to choose the chewier ones to treat a hypo, chewing is hard work and it delays the action. And liquorice is slower than winegums to start with.
I would never deliberately dose a little too much in hopes on a fix of liquorice or fruit of course.
(How did you know???)
Side tracking but refusing food because it would mean me taking insulin........is a very simple thought process but most non diabetics don't get it.try to chose something I'd like to eat and and probably wouldn't otherwise bother with as it would require extra insulin on a normal day -
Indeed, it's probably quite a good way of avoiding eating things that aren't very good for me, knowing I'll need to deal with the aftermath, but it does mean I also suffer from the problem of trying to select which of these delightful things I should eat to treat my hypo, all the while getting lower and lower.Side tracking but refusing food because it would mean me taking insulin........is a very simple thought process but most non diabetics don't get it.
Getting a wriggle on to try to help get my insulin working quicker is another one....
Happy monday
Tony
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?