It would be nice to say that the results are not diabetic, but sadly they do fulfil the official criteria.
'Official' criteteria include
random venous plasma glucose concentration › 11.1 mmol/l
or
a fasting plasma glucose concentration › 7.0 mmol/l (whole blood › 6.1mmol/l)
or
two hour plasma glucose concentration › 11.1 mmol/l two hours after 75g anhydrous glucose in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
These tests have to be repeated (as your doctor has done) if there are no other symptoms, frequently with type 2,there are no other symptoms.
This poster describing a small study of continuous BG measurements in people without diabetes. It shows that only a couple of subjects infrequently reached a BG of 200mgl/dl (11.1mmol )http://professional.diabetes.org/Content/Posters/2007/p0401-P.pdf[/url]
At the moment you are seeing a high peak after eating, though are then able to produce enough insulin to bring the level down. During the fasting period your BG is rising, your liver may be producing more glucose than you need.
The better news is that its been diagnosed now, rather than later,causing 'silent' damage. There are many people who are able to achieve good control with diet and exercise.
It may be that by adding some exercise and by becoming aware of what spikes your BG (the glycemic index and using your meter may help here) you can reduce the peaks. If you are at all overweight, reducing weight by 5% can improve overall BG levels. see
http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cg...18e5be9c6a309fb0da74d4f9&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha