I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
There are many people living with diabetes who have not been diagnosed. They may have had the condition for many years. The reason they have not been diagnosed is that they have no symptoms (or their symptoms are not severe enough for them to seek medical help). I know how dangerous diabetes is, I've seen people lose their sight, have their toes feet and legs amputated and ultimately suffer kidney failure. One guy was 50 when he died. But, that doesn't make complications inevitable.I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
My first HbA1c was 13% - off the chart and yet I didn't have the tiredness, weight loss, blurred vision, frothy pee etc. I was put on Metformin immediately, and I was peeved but now I can see why my GP did that though.
I developed retinopathy then maculopathy and was told that I needed laser treatment. I freaked, asked for time to think about it. In the meantime I had gone organic and 6 months later my maculopathy had almost completely gone. Consultant showed me the dramatic photos.
It is hard work. I was the worst case GP had ever seen, he wasn't convinced about LCHF and worried about me. But knowing that I've improved my health dramatically is worth it.
LCHF is not a cure for diabetes of any type, but it can really help.
The article may also be scary but all diabetes can be! There are at least 3 different stages of retinopathy (http://www.diabetes.co.uk/diabetes-complications/diabetic-retinopathy.html?utm_source=Communicator&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Untitled22&utm_campaign=Aching+eyes+++retinopathy&utm_dispatch ID=3629262&utm_email name=DCUK+-+29/09) and your @helensaramay (background? - I suppose) retinopathy experience may be different from other people's case. I've decided to invest my money on my health and purchased about a year ago that Noctura 400 mask mentioned in the article as well as CGM systems (Dexcom G4 first, which I've more recently replaced with the Freestyle Libre - flash glucose monitoring - cheaper to run). I'm type 1 by the way and that can make a difference but I don't understand why I should fear for my life everyday when there are already options available out there. Money??? Everybody's free to judge its own case here but I still believe that preventing worth much more than treating.As for your second point - I have had diabetes for 12 years and, over that time, maintained my blood sugars well. Unfortunately, I have some mild retinopathy. It's there but it does not affect me and I have been advised (by multiple consultants) that it does not require any treatment and can very likely remain at this level for the rest of my life. So, based on my very small sample of one, I would suggest that the article you have read is scary - anything to do with the eyes (or heart or ...) is frightening but just because you have a condition of the eyes, does not mean you are going to lose your eye sight.
You have a point re stats as I would counter that 2 people made me and my brothers (total 4) we have 12 children now so 8 (4 couples) makes 8 suggests a different scenario of increasing population.I think it was Mark Twain who said that there are lies **** lies and statistics. You can make statistics say anything you want to really.
For instance I can show how the world population is shrinking. For everyone reading this thread for example it took two people to make us, four to make those two, eight to make those four, sixteen to make those eight and so on so every generation back doubles, so therefore centuries ago the population must have been way bigger than it now based upon this seemingly logical process and yet we know it is not the case even though this particular way of arriving at the statistic is difficult to argue against.
I and am sure all the others who read this forum will manage our diabetes as best we can so that the statistics change as I others have said, it is unknown how many in their calculation have not tried hard enough to manage their condition through either not bothering or not knowing.
There is a very old quote, not sure who said it that goes "There are Lies, **** Lies and Statistics" in otherword they can be manipulated to say whatever the researcher wants them to say to prove their point of view/research. eg I could say that 68.6% of statistics are made up on the spot!I agree with you. And like yourself, I'll be fighting every step of the way. But, strong words don't change the statistics within the article.
So, I guess how we manage our diabetes with diet, medication or both, is the ultimate strategy in minimising the risk of complications. If some Type 2 diabetics manage their BG with insulin, then so be it. It certainly makes more sense to me to have tight glycaemic control with insulin, rather than high numbers without it. This "I'm a better diabetic than you" mentality, when someone takes no medication for glycaemic control, drives me nuts!! It's even worse than pitting Type 1's against Type 2's. Soooo unnecessary, & **** well insulting too. Good blood glucose control is paramount for all diabetics, however we achieve it.
I totally agree with you about insulin being better than high BGs, for those who need it. And I so agree about the competitive stuff we sometimes see on the forum. We don't know everything about a person and we have no right to think less of them because they do or don't take meds or whatever. Lots of us have complex medical needs and our treatment options are fewer than those who only have T2. Pitting T1s against T2s is a breach of the forum rules, as is being extremely insistent about eating methods. We're all supposed to be here to give and receive support.If some Type 2 diabetics manage their BG with insulin, then so be it. It certainly makes more sense to me to have tight glycaemic control with insulin, rather than high numbers without it. This "I'm a better diabetic than you" mentality, when someone takes no medication for glycaemic control, drives me nuts!! It's even worse than pitting Type 1's against Type 2's. Soooo unnecessary, & **** well insulting too. Good blood glucose control is paramount for all diabetics, however we achieve it.
I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
I was diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes in February 1997, since which time I have been taking 1000mg Metformin twice daily and 4mg Glimepiride each morning. I keep to a low carb diet - though not ultra low - and my blood-sugar levels average around 6.1. Moving towards insulin has never been considered by my Medical Team and my annual retinopathy tests show no changes since I was first diagnosed. I have no problems with neuropathy or reduced blood-flow to feet or hands. The above prognosis, then, is not necessarily accurate. Clearly you need to monitor your carbohydrate intake, but there is no reason to believe that moving onto insulin and retinopathy are inevitable!I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
Hi,I receive the "Type 2 and you" newsletter from The Independent Diabetes Trust. Today, the September, issue 24, landed on my doormat. Having just read it, I am distressed & disturbed by what has been written. And I quote: "On average, people with Type 2 diabetes will need to start taking insulin seven years after diagnosis." I had NO idea that this is my future with this **** disease. It's frightening.
The article on Diabetic Retinopathy States "After 20 years of Diabetes, nearly all patients with Type 1 diabetes and >60% of patients with Type 2 diabetes will have some degree of retinopathy." Again, this frightens & saddens me. Of course, I know about diabetic complications. I made it my business to educate & inform myself, via this forum and other resources, when I was diagnosed earlier this year. Am I really so naive not to be aware of this prognosis. I'm angry! Rightly or wrongly so.
The Independent Diabetes Trust is a competent, trustworthy & reliable organisation with a good reputation, who educate and support those with this disease. I've no reason not to believe their statistics. I'm gutted to be honest.
All advice, views, personal experience & opinions will be gratefully received. Oh, and here's a link to the newsletter.
http://iddt.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Type2andYou-Sep2015.pdf
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?