Tim,That's a great, and very interesting article thanks Catherine. It reflects a lot of what I think of and feel about Bernstein and the Bernstein approach to dealing with diabetes. There's more to life. It's good to see a more balanced viewpoint being articulated.
What I find equally interesting is that we don't speak more to this style of diabetes management when we see new T1s on board. There seems to be a tendency to jump onto the Low Carb/Bernstein rocks view as the way to live a diabetic life (and I've been just as guilty) when the reality is that you have to try and live a life, and an extremist one (in any form) pushes out a lot of other things. If it works for you, that's great, but I think there is more to life than trying to live till I'm 90.
Once again, thanks for that!
Now this may be a controversial topic but... hang with me.
As a T1 of 2/3rds of my life, I am fully aware of the inevitable ups and downs of glucose levels in response to foods, insulin, stress, etc. I have days where I get a great straight line and days where it's a roller coaster. My diet is fairly consistent and pretty clearly laid out, and yet, I still sometimes struggle with keeping everything aligned. Varying responses to protein shakes, basals, etc in response to exercise and all sorts. And this week hasn't been the best of weeks in terms of managing to keep a coastal railway as opposed to a rollercoaster, has been reasonably stressful, and so is influencing my thinking somewhat in this post!
Don't get me wrong, I understand why it happens, and I'm managing to achieve decent Hba1C levels, but sometimes, the relentless striving for "normal" glucose levels feels oppressive. Whilst controlling in a reasonable range is relatively straightforward and I tend to find myself "sugar surfing" a lot as a mechanism of control, sometimes I look back at the past where there was less testing and I was still achieving a half decent Hba1C level with rose tinted glasses.
What I find myself wondering is whether the forum tends towards encouraging people to strive for something that, whilst not impossible to achieve, requires a large amount of work to achieve, and potentially can feel almost oppressive about it. We consistently suggest that heading into "normal" territory is a good thing because it reduces complications. But so does running an average of 6.5 instead of 8.5 mmol/l.
Given the amount of life there is to get on with, do we as a forum encourage and perhaps proselytize towards something that is more demanding and short sighted (and potentially oppressive) than our diabetic consultants attempt to? Do they take into account something about the human psyche that we don't? What are your thoughts?
Maybe I'm just having a grumpy week, and I get that the "Eatwell" plat doesn't encourage eating well, but I think that sometimes we don't temper our knowledge of our illness, or search for additional knowledge with the base fact that other approaches have successfully worked for many people, and we don't need to assume that the right answer for everyone is the low carb/law of small numbers route.
@Mike D, there is nothing wrong with that approach. The point I'd make is that as a T1, managing glucose levels within the tight tolerances that are being advocated is far more of a challenge than as a type 2 doing it by diet alone. I'm not denigrating the difficulties of the sustaining the diet, but it is not the only thing you have to manage when you are without your own insulin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?