I hope you contacted Abbott for every failing sensor, they usually replace without issue. In the case of a sensor failure halfway through a sensor it even means you get some extra days because they'll send you 14 days worth of new sensor even if the old one failed at 13 days.Since starting on the cgm journey I've had about an 80% success rate with sensors working at all which given the cost of these things is not great.
Using alternative apps like DiaBox can be helpful because they can be calibrated.The results of my small experiment were not favourable for the Libre 2 sensor.
In a nutshell, my sensor measures on average at least 1mmol/L above at the top end and 1mmol/L below at the bottom end.
DiaBox can only be used with Libre as far as I know.@Antje77 can you use DiaBox with a Dexcom G7 or is it just for use with the Freestyle Libre?
I've only had my G7 for about a week, never really thought about calibrating. I'll go read that link. Thanks!DiaBox can only be used with Libre as far as I know.
I know there are alternative apps for other sensors as well but I'm not familiar with them at all because I've only used Libre.
Google tells me the G7 can be calibrated, does this not work well for you?
Can I calibrate* Dexcom G7? | Dexcom
You can log a BG meter value as an event, or use a BG meter value as a calibration within the G7 App on your smart device or on the receiver.www.dexcom.com
If you only had your G7 for a week, I'd take your time getting aqcuainted with it and it's perks before even thinking about calibrating.I've only had my G7 for about a week, never really thought about calibrating. I'll go read that link. Thanks!
I was just curious, that's all.If you only had your G7 for a week, I'd take your time getting aqcuainted with it and it's perks before even thinking about calibrating.
Any particular reason you asked about using it with DiaBox?
Curious is good, staying curious is the best way to learn about our condition and how to best manage it in my opinion!I was just curious, that's all.
I certainly will.Curious is good, staying curious is the best way to learn about our condition and how to best manage it in my opinion!
If you have any questions or experiences to share with your Dexcom, please post.
Hi,I'm type 1 for over 40 years now and a fairly latecomer to cgm tech.
I've been using a Libre 2 sensor for around 2 years now and I'm happy to embrace new technology when it is of benefit to me.
Since starting on the cgm journey I've had about an 80% success rate with sensors working at all which given the cost of these things is not great.
My biggest bugbear however is the accuracy of them. I've conducted a side by side test in the last few days with my contour next one finger prick meter.
This contour meter is without doubt one of the most reliable bits of kit I've ever had . It gives results which coincide with how I'm feeling at that particular time.
The results of my small experiment were not favourable for the Libre 2 sensor.
In a nutshell, my sensor measures on average at least 1mmol/L above at the top end and 1mmol/L below at the bottom end.
For anyone who is concerned about their time in range it's a gamechanger. You start with a 6 point window between 3.9 and 10 mmol/L , which is now reduced by 33.33333% to a 4 point window which stretches from 4.9 to 9.0 mmol/L.
Life is hard enough without having your margins squeezed to this extent.
Maybe it's just me? I don't know, which is why I'm putting this out there.
Before anyone starts on about the arrows and direction of travel, don't bother. My sensor can't even predict these with any accuracy.
I also learned about compression lows today. That was an eye opener. The things they neglect to tell you eh!
As far as I'm concerned, hitting time in range targets using a libre 2 sensor is akin to a Stevie Wonder hole in one at Gleneagles.
Thoughts please.
Well done to you for keeping control to that extent whilst on dialysis.My experience with the libre is positive I know that it’s never going to be same as a finger prick this was explained explained during my training course. I don’t worry if there is 1 point of a difference as to be honest it’s . I keep my range between 5 and 9 if my reading is 9 i finger prick some people e go chop keep their range much tighter , my time in range is at 82 % plus my Hb1ac is between 48 -52 which considering I m on dialysis I’m told is very good plus I rarely have hypos anymore due to the low alarm settings I know everyone’s experiences are different but I would definitely rather have it than not as I can remember no personal blood sugar meters when my Hb1ac was above 95
I'd 100% agree with that. In the mid range it's not tragically bad.Hi,
What I’ve found with the algorythm of the L2 is it can be ahead of the meter on a BG decent & a little behind on a rise?
Even slower coming out of a low..
On a relatively straight line? It’s close to about 0.6mmol with the meter for me..
As sensor reads interstitial fluid. From what I can understand interstitial fluid is the last inline for recovering blood glucose from a low with the brain taking priority?
Staying suitably hydrated helps with a more reliable reading, too..
Hi again,I'd 100% agree with that. In the mid range it's not tragically bad.
At the low end it takes forever to pick back up again.
This for me has meant several hours sitting in supermarket car parks waiting for my ****** sensor to catch up with reality.
5 to drive and all that.
Could anyone explain to me why a sensor which goes deeper into your arm than a lancet penetrates your finger should be measuring different types of blood.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?