Hold on, hold on; I'm a couch potato glutton and I'm Type 1 so where does that leave me?
Alternatively, we change 'Type 1 Diabetes' to Type '10 Diabetes' cos you know, it's bigger
I think we should all just get our heads around renaming this thing. I propose "Howard and Hilda"; after all, they were similar, but quite different?
Am I showing my age here?
Great idea! I quite like the Greed Glucose and Girth one, that gets my vote. It would be good to do this and then have a study to see how many type 1's are more relaxed about the fact that we exist. Would they have less stress and therefore find their BG's easier to control? We could save the NHS so much money on drugs. We could be heroes instead of villains for a change.We could always keep the Type 1 name, because, you know, it isn't their fault.
But for all of us blobby, self indulgent, weak willed couch potato types... (Even the skinny, fit, active ones who don't slob yet) well, I think could come up with something a bit better than boring old Type 2...
How about
Epicurean diabetes
The Chocolate Lover's Appreciation Society
Exercise Resistant Diabetes
The Gluttoneers
Greed, Glucose and Girth
Hunger United
LaZy Boys and Girls (reclining chair an obligatory accessory)
We could start a poll... select the most popular, and petition the medical High Poohbahs for an international proclamation.
I'm thinking something similar to milk classification in the UK.
Obviously Type 2 would be full fat or blue top as that's the only possible reason for it as proven by the media.
Type 1 would obviously have to be the Gold top of diabetes as we didn't ask for it and didn't deserve it. My classification doesn't stand up to scrutiny here as gold top is extra fat and creamy whereas all Type 1's are without doubt super skinny so should really be red top. Gold sounds so much more appropriate for all our extra suffering
I read this often and wonder. I only know 3 type ones and none of them are thin. Not overly
I read this often and wonder. I only know 3 type ones and none of them are thin. Not overly
fat but certainly not thin
.
Dislike.I have been a Type 1 diabetic for nearly 40 years and have managed to keep very good control--so far having no complications. My reason for this blog is to get opinions on petitioning to get a name change for Type 1 diabetes. I find that I am frequently asked the question "were you very fat?". My reply is that I have always been very slim. The problem is that the general public do not seem to understand that Type 1 diabetes is totally different from Type 2. There is so much written in the media about Diabetes being a lifestyle choice and it is not understood that there are various forms of the disease.I think it would be so much less confusing if Type 1 Diabetes could be renamed and would cause us Type 1's less stress in being thought of as coach potato gluttons.
We could always keep the Type 1 name, because, you know, it isn't their fault.
But for all of us blobby, self indulgent, weak willed couch potato types... (Even the skinny, fit, active ones who don't slob yet) well, I think could come up with something a bit better than boring old Type 2...
How about
Epicurean diabetes
The Chocolate Lover's Appreciation Society
Exercise Resistant Diabetes
The Gluttoneers
Greed, Glucose and Girth
Hunger United
LaZy Boys and Girls (reclining chair an obligatory accessory)
We could start a poll... select the most popular, and petition the medical High Poohbahs for an international proclamation.
Well, they are skinny compared with me.
Almost everyone is skinny compared with me.
Poor wee stick creatures.
How do they not break when bumping into things? Or having sex? Or hugging?
It is very puzzling.
Hugs.That's because most thin Type 1's are so wary of snapping, we wear padded protective underwear, thus resembling Oompah Loompahs. So that's how we don't break. Unfortunately, the side effect are that we DO bump into things a lot, and are so wide in circumference we rarely get hugs, or errr ,the other thing .
So really , it IS our own fault we are constantly confused with Type 2's all the time
So now having broken the code of secrecy that all Type 1's are required to swear to,- the reason I have done this and risk ritual whipping with a kipper, is to say that whether Type 1 or Type 2, we are all people underneath
And of course, if we "Come Out" and shed the padding - there's the possibility of hugs. And errr, the other thing
Signy
Dont worry - your secret is safe with me!That's because most thin Type 1's are so wary of snapping, we wear padded protective underwear, thus resembling Oompah Loompahs. So that's how we don't break. Unfortunately, the side effect are that we DO bump into things a lot, and are so wide in circumference we rarely get hugs, or errr ,the other thing .
So really , it IS our own fault we are constantly confused with Type 2's all the time
So now having broken the code of secrecy that all Type 1's are required to swear to,- the reason I have done this and risk ritual whipping with a kipper, is to say that whether Type 1 or Type 2, we are all people underneath
And of course, if we "Come Out" and shed the padding - there's the possibility of hugs. And errr, the other thing
Signy
Can we please stop the silliness .Dont worry - your secret is safe with me!
And when you've finished with that kipper, may I eat it? With clotted cream and a dab of horseradish?
You can have a bit, if you like. Cos you obviously need feeding up!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?